To pick up on John's point from this side of the pond, there are plenty of
duple improper dances that end with a partner swing for the active couples.

There are quite a few dances which could be started in either becket
formation or duple improper, allowing further scope in the pairing of dance
and music: i recently had the challenge of trying to pair a dance with
"Staten Island Hornpipe", which has very assertive balances in measures 3
and 4 of the b-part. One of the few satisfying moves there would be "walk
in to wavy lines", but off the cuff i couldn't think of any dances with
those "trip to" wavy lines in the B part (I'm sure they're out there,
though....). Becket variations of existing dances provided some options.

I guess what i'm [being overly abstract about] here is the idea that saying
a dance requires certain moves to be a "becket dance" - or that a certain
formation precludes certain moves - unnecessarily confines the form.
Associating a dance with the composer's intended "starting formation"
allows us to not only focus on the choreographic flow that starting
formation provides, but to create variations when it's advantageous.



Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:05:20 -0000
> From: "John Sweeney" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] What is a Becket
> Message-ID: <6E7516378A0B4D8CADD73426CE5E3BD1@study>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> Becky Nankivell said:
> "A duple improper can't have a partner swing as the last move."
>
> Lots of old duple improper dances do - the swing is just across the set
> instead of along the side.  And some modern dances do the same, perhaps
> more on this side of the Atlantic.
>
> Of course you have to careful calling one like that if the hall is too
> crowded lengthwise.
>
>            Happy dancing,
>                   John
>
> John Sweeney, Dancer, England   [email protected] 01233 625 362 &
> 07802 940 574
> http://www.modernjive.com for Modern Jive Events & DVDs
> http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to