I love the idea, and I would utilize it as a very useful resource. I'm not so 
concerned about deeing possibly inferior material ... I'd be interested in the 
exchange of ideas.

Bring it on! 

Brian Hamshar
Virginia 

Alan Winston <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 5/8/2012 6:35 PM, Mark Hillegonds wrote:
>
> > It's been my experience that unless one is a well-known choreographer 
>(Ravitz, >Hume, Ormand, Sanella, Olsen, and any number of others) it can 
>be difficult get >new dances into the light of day and, in the theme of 
>mentorship, get feedback on >them. There are certainly a number of 
>dances posted to this list and feedback is >readily and warmly given. I 
>have gleaned a number of dances from this list and am >glad to see them, 
>both as a caller and choreographer.
>
> >Three of questions for you:
>
> >1. Do you see this [Caller] list an appropriate place to publish new 
>dances? Too >many postings of new dances could dilute the [Caller] 
>aspect of the list.
>
>I do see it as an appropriate place.  It seems mutually beneficial to me 
>for choreographers to put new dances under caller's noses, and the 
>volume of new dances posted so far isn't very high.
>
>There are three types of postings that, for me as a caller (acting like 
>a filter feeder who snags things as they come by) have almost the same 
>effect:
>
>  - I wrote down this dance - anybody know what it is?
>
>  - I think I made up this dance - does it exist already?
>
>- Here's my cool new dance - I hope you'll like it.
>
>I don't see much point in segregating the third type of post to another 
>list.
>
>
>
> > 2. Do you feel there would be interest in a separate [Choreographer] 
>list? I can >see this list really focusing on creating new dances, 
>getting feedback, and >getting the word out about new dances. It could 
>be a nice venue for >choreographic student/mentorship stuff to happen.
>
>If there were one, I would probably sign up so that I didn't miss 
>anything.  That's different from thinking there's actual demand for it.
>
> >3. What would you think about a monthly dances-of-the-month email to 
> >consolidate new dances into a single or some moderated number of emails
>
>The devil is in the details there.  From what pool are the new dances 
>drawn?  Who's doing the moderating?  What makes the cut?
>
>-- Alan
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Callers mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Reply via email to