Chrissy Fowler wrote:
>> Seems most people most of the time balance the ring toward the center and 
>> back.  Was it formerly more of a balance right then left?  

Colin Hume wrote:
> In the original (Scottish) dance it was a "set" rather than a "balance", and 
> that would be to the right and left.


Current SCD styling has setting being pretty much on the spot (even for 
balance-in-line), though I'm not sure how much that is a C20th invention of 
Miss Milligan's. Both the Petronella turn and the set are done with the setting 
step. The contra style balance-the-ring-and-Petronella occurs a couple of SCDs 
e.g. Back to the Fireside.

Beth Parkes wrote:
> One of the contra dance traditions has been a small set of named moves and, 
> for the most part, directional names for any new moves. So, for example,  we 
> say, "Pass through to an ocean wave," instead of "Pass the ocean." Please, 
> please fight any tendency to give obscure names for moves. If it is not 
> descriptive, it is not appropriate.

Named figures are a shorthand that lets the caller concisely call a figure that 
they've already described. Unless you're going to call every movement every 
time, there's no particular harm in using a name that's not descriptive, as 
long as it's been explained. Pass the Ocean is actually a good example of this, 
as describing the movements would be more like "pass through, ladies catching 
LH and turning a quarter, men taking partner's RH at the far end of the line", 
though I'd avoid putting too many such figures on a programme unless I knew the 
dancers were familiar with them. Contra already includes many jargon terms it 
would be impractical to do without - gypsy, balance, cast &c. Petronella is far 
from obscure, and is the word I would use to call the movement once I'd walked 
it through. But I come from an SCD background where we have many more long 
figures that have extremely non-descriptive names (Espagnole, Tourbillon, 
Schiehallion Reel &c.).

and:
> And I was doing the two's variation in Petronella which uses a left turn back 
> in the early 80s.

Can you describe this in more detail? If you spin to the left, don't you crash 
into the 1s spinning to the right?

Edmund Croft,
Cambridge, UK

Reply via email to