Whle that is a fun part of these dances - I don't think that is what makes them 
memorable and so popular.  As Michael said - there are lots of dances that do 
the and I can only think of a couple - probably because they don't have that 
something extra that makes them memorable

Mac



________________________________
 From: George Mercer <[email protected]>
To: Mac Mckeever <[email protected]>; Caller's discussion list 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Callers] 3,33-33
 


Could the popularity have something to do with dancing with multiple neighbors 
and coming back to your original neighbor?



On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Mac Mckeever <[email protected]> wrote:

My theory is that 3-33-33, much like Beneficial Tradition, besides being 
wonderfully arranged, contains a unique and popular figure that has become 
associated with that dance and is not found in many other dances.
>
>Susan's dance is also a masterpiece of choreography - but does not contain a 
>signature figure.  That doesn't stop it from being one of my favorites - but 
>does keep it from standing out over time.
>
>A few times I have called an evening with no planned program and allowed the 
>dancer to request dances.  Beneficial is by far the most requested.  That 
>doesn't make it the best dance - but it is one of the most memorable.
>
>Mac
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Michael Fuerst <[email protected]>
>To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]>
>Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 9:07 PM
>Subject: [Callers] 3,33-33
>
>
>
>Although I consider 3,33-33 an excellent dance, so  many have designated  
>3,33-33 as awesome that it, like the word awesome, has become overused.
>
>Some years ago (I speculate 20 or so)  Susan Kevra wrote this wonderful dance 
>Trip to Phan Reel   
>(http://www.prismnet.com/contradance/sequences/trip-to-phan-reel.html)
>For a year or so one could hardly attend a dance weekend without dancing Trip 
>to Phan Reel.    Then it slowly subsided to very  occasional use.
>
>Does anyone have any ideas why  the calling of 3-33-33 (of the same vintage, 
>as suggested by 
>http://www.cambridgefolk.org.uk/contra/dances/steve_zakon/three_33_33.html),  
>has not similarly subsided ?
> 
>Michael Fuerst      802 N Broadway      Urbana IL 61801       217-239-5844
>Links to photos of many of my drawings and paintings are at 
>www.ArtComesFuerst.com
>_______________________________________________
>Callers mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>_______________________________________________
>Callers mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>

Reply via email to