to be clear, I don't know if it WAS Carol.  it's a good dance.

And Yoyo - WOW - what a great analysis!!! 

Laur





>________________________________
> From: Yoyo Zhou <[email protected]>
>To: Laur <[email protected]>; Caller's discussion list 
><[email protected]> 
>Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 9:51 PM
>Subject: Re: [Callers] rocks and dirt by Erik Weberg
> 
>
>
>On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Laur <[email protected]> wrote:
>Can anyone share their opinion on why the caller would have chosen to make the 
>change in the dance?  orientation or flow?
>>
>
>
>It's hard to know for sure without asking Carol (or whoever it was that 
>changed it). Here are some reasons (and examples) I can think of for 
>variations to be created:
>
>
>- Fix poor transitions (right and left thru->circle left, ladies chain->next 
>neighbor balance).
>- Fix timing issues (swing ending in the middle of a phrase).
>- Add things that are missing (no partner swing, no neighbor swing).
>- Eliminate unwanted figures (a balance in a smooth dance, a circle right, too 
>many circle lefts).
>- Make a dance easier to dance or to teach (use hands in the circular hey).
>- Other aesthetic reasons (substituting balance/gypsy/dosido before a swing).
>
>
>Those who feel strongly enough about choreography to change dances to fit 
>their programs have some aesthetic by which they judge the new dance to be 
>better than the original, but different callers prioritize different things. 
>As Alan mentioned, some callers (myself included) put a high value on a 
>neighbor swing because dancers seem to like it. Perhaps Carol (or whoever) 
>values the transitions here more than the original, enough to outweigh the 
>lack of a neighbor swing.
>
>
>What are the questionable transitions in the original? If the circular hey is 
>done without hands, the balance is no problem. But swing to ladies chain is 
>not the smoothest. And (I noticed when I coincidentally called this dance) 
>there are ladies who will accidentally try to chain back instead of 
>allemanding. But I think there's still that risk of confusion in the revised 
>dance, as the ladies have the same cue twice - the other lady extending a 
>right hand.
>
>
>(For the record, I think I called it with the variation A1 gypsy and swing. My 
>reasons: it flows well, it feels like a good fit with that part of the dance, 
>and I hadn't called any gypsy and swings yet in my program.)
>
>
>Yoyo Zhou
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to