Thanks Lindsay.  This piece is excellent.  It highlights the nonverbal
teaching that is central to community dance.

- Greg McKenzie
West Coast, USA


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Lindsay Morris <[email protected]>wrote:

> Bruce Hamilton's excellent one-pager on how experienced dancers can best
> help <http://www.portlandcountrydance.org/files/When%20Not%20Caller.pdf
> >newcomers
> is worth a read.  In fact, it's worth handing out at the dance.
>
> --------------------
> Lindsay Morris
> CEO, TSMworks
> Tel. 1-859-539-9900
> [email protected]
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:54 AM, rich sbardella <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Greg wrote:
> > ...But that's a lot of words to cram in at the very end of the dance
> > phrase.  If the dance started with "Balance and swing" for example, I
> could
> > fit in the word "Balance" which only takes one beat.
> > I'm thinking of just dropping the dance from my repertoire.
> >
> >
> > There would be a lot of dances to drop.  A square dance caller might say
> > Pass thru and Dosi Next.  It easily fits in, takes a syllable out and
> > dancers hear Dosi as Dosido.  In walkthrough you could explain your call
> if
> > needed.
> >
> > Rich Sbardella
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Greg McKenzie <[email protected]>
> > To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5:53 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Callers] Circle & pass through as the last move of a dance
> >
> >
> > Dave wrote:
> >
> > > Logistically, I think Greg's approach is difficult to make work.
>  There's
> > > always a new move happening after the pass through, so in effect,
> you'll
> > be
> > > calling four beats of "pass through, something something," usually
> > "balance
> > > here" or whatnot.  Because there's no break between the instruction
> "pass
> > > through" and the instruction that follows it, I don't think dancers
> > > generally realize from that phrasing that the pass through is intended
> to
> > > occur after exactly six beats of the circle.
> > >
> >
> > You are absolutely correct Dave!  Structuring calls precisely is often
> very
> > difficult and I sometimes simply drop a dance because the prompts become
> > too jumbled when actually given at the correct beat.  I posted to this
> > thread because I was, coincidentally, working on a dance called Kiss the
> > Bride by Jeffery Spero.
> >
> > Kiss the Bride is particularly difficult because it uses the circle 3/4,
> > pass through transition at the end and the last call I need to fit in is
> > "dosido" which takes two beats.  Because it is where the progression
> takes
> > place I also want to say "With the NEXT" to make that clear as well.  On
> my
> > current dance card I "solved" the problem by giving the "Pass Through"
> call
> > early.  That is unacceptable to me and I was trying to come up with a
> good
> > way to make it work using calls that are precisely in time with the
> > phrasing.
> >
> > My current card reads:
> >
> > B2:  _ _ _ _ [Hands Four and] Circle RIGHT!
> >        _ [Three Places], Pass Through, with the NEXT Dosido
> >
> > To fix the timing I'm considering something like:
> >
> > B2:  _ _ _ _ [Hands Four and] Circle RIGHT!
> >        _ _ [Three Places], Pass Through, NEXT Dosido
> >
> > ...But that's a lot of words to cram in at the very end of the dance
> > phrase.  If the dance started with "Balance and swing" for example, I
> could
> > fit in the word "Balance" which only takes one beat.
> >
> > I'm thinking of just dropping the dance from my repertoire.
> >
> > Thanks for reading.
> >
> > Greg McKenzie
> > West Coast, USA
> > _______________________________________________
> > Callers mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> > _______________________________________________
> > Callers mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>

Reply via email to