On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Creativeness is of lower priority than visual identity to me. There's > nothing really wrong with more explicit message that that we wish to > maintain our visual identity. In some countries, especially the USA, > public appearance of nonprofits, usually foundations, is much more > like of companies (in good sense), see Linux Foundation, Mozilla, > GNOME (http://foundation.gnome.org/licensing/index.html). Well quiet curiously, I do think that the gnome guidelines are rather good (especially since they don't mix in the LGPL). And they cover aspects that are missing (ie like using the logo for books, journals/blogs). So yes, I have no objection in taking them as an example. But that is not what we currently have in the draft.
-- Cyrille Berger Skott _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
