> On Sept. 3, 2012, 9:48 p.m., Jarosław Staniek wrote: > > A number of suggestions to fight clutter a bit: > > - Should 'East asian characters' be visible by default? If there are o > > asian characters maybe you could hide the label. > > - Flesch reading ease -> Reading ease > > (I noted this before and it was marked as fixed but is this fixed? I see > > no comments on that, and how this scientific term would be translated e.g. > > to German or Polish and still generally usable.) > > - Characters (excluding spaces) -> Characters > > (it's obvious for non-techies that characters are not spaces, and the > > the other value explicitly includes spaces) > > Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > - I guess 'East asian characters' is currently not visible by default (at > least it wasn't in 2.5). If it is in master, that should be reversed of > course. > > - I suggested to Shreya to use "Readability" as label with "Flesch > Reading Ease" as a Tooltip. Would that work? > > - No, it is _not_ obvious to non-techies that characters does not include > spaces. I just asked a "non-techie" and she thought that it _does_ include > spaces, because she knows character counts mainly from character limits in > forms or text messages, which usually do include spaces. I looked at Libre > Office, and they have "Characters" and "Characters exlucing spaces", so they > include them by default as well. Google docs has "Characters (with spaces)" > and "Characters (no spaces)", so they obviously were undecided. I'd suggest > we should go with the Google Docs labeling as it is unambiguous but not as > long as the current labels. > > Jarosław Staniek wrote: > @Thomas > Yes, "Readability" would work great. > I am also ok for "Characters (with spaces)" and "Characters (no spaces)" > - these are shorter equivalents to what we have now. > PS: Interesting point about intuition changed among SMS users - I did not > consider this change in recent years - this applies to some of our users. > > Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Great, so I unless someone else strongly disagrees, I guess we have > decided :) > > And yes, it is interesting how the technology we use changes our > perception.
I've fixed those strings now, and made them i18n - C. ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106252/#review18471 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 31, 2012, 12:19 p.m., Shreya Pandit wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106252/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 31, 2012, 12:19 p.m.) > > > Review request for Calligra, Thomas Pfeiffer and Inge Wallin. > > > Description > ------- > > This allows the Statistics Docker to update its layout horizontally, when > placed in bottom area. > > > Diffs > ----- > > words/part/dockers/KWStatistics.h c480502 > words/part/dockers/KWStatistics.cpp a006d97 > words/part/dockers/KWStatisticsDocker.h fab6c7f > words/part/dockers/KWStatisticsDocker.cpp 0bc8130 > words/part/dockers/KWStatisticsDocker.ui 63eaee5 > words/part/dockers/StatisticsPreferencesPopup.h b481806 > words/part/dockers/StatisticsPreferencesPopup.cpp c741622 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106252/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Checked for calligra words and calligra author > > > Screenshots > ----------- > > The layout > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106252/s/713/ > > > Thanks, > > Shreya Pandit > >
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
