On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:26:33 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 19 December 2012 13:19, C. Boemann <c...@boemann.dk> wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 13:11:51 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > >> On 19 December 2012 12:59, C. Boemann <c...@boemann.dk> wrote: > >> > Yes i'm not attached to alpine in any way. I couldn't come up with a > >> > generic name that describes the library very well ( and no flaketools > >> > doesn't unless we wan to have many such similarly named libraries) and > >> > so when i wrote the mail that was just a codename that sprung to mind. > >> > >> After re-reading your initial post, how about: basictools or > >> generictools? > > > > but since it may grow to hold shapes and dockers too i would find > > something named tools misleading > > APIs for tools, shapes and dockers are defined in libflake, right? So > how about basicflake or basicflakes? i was toying with flakebasics but was scared it might sound like something flake depended on
now with basicflakes it's much better _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
