On Sunday 17 February 2013 Feb, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Currently CalligraActive is only built in TINY build set.
That sounds wrong to me. I think we need a) Full build: build everything that can be built b) Active build: build only the things needed for Active c) Creative build: build only krita and karbon. > TINY also limits the > filters which are installed. What is the purpose of TINY? Who is known to use > TINY? Could it perhaps be removed, or rather changed to ACTIVEONLY? As inge explained, tiny is a historical artefact, it dates back to the FreOffice/Calligra mobile days. > One thing that also seems strange to me is that the executables are also done > in the parts/ subdirs for most programs. What about splitting that out into a > sibling app/ subdir? Would help with structure I wouldn't mind that. It's currently not consisten in any case across all applications. For instance, krita doesn't have a part directory, and the part and the exe are in the toplevel krita directory. Mind -- I think we need to get rid of KParts and KoParts completely, but that's something I'm investigating and want to discuss at the sprint. > And I would also ask to move Author out of its ambush and give it a full real > toplevel dir, to reduce the complexity in dir layout. Or is there any real > need to have it there? Now it even has an icon ;), no need to be shy and > hide. > And time for an own SHOULD_BUILD_AUTHOR. I'd wait with that until we can do a real refactoring... The way author and words are mixed up is really ugly, but I don't see how it can be easily fixed. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
