+ 1 On Thursday 27 August 2015 14:22:19 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, 27. August 2015, 09:57:32 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt: > > I think that the frameworks branch is now ready to be called 3.0. It's > > obviously not ready to release to end users, but we should make it the > > new master. But let's call it the frameworks branch for now. > > +1 for making frameworks master now :) > > Proposal: > Let's change and not (ab)use the "3.0" version label for the current > development milestone in the frameworks branch where initial port could be > declared done-with-no-big-regressions, and thus also not do the first > release as "3.1". > Let's instead use the "3.0" version for the first release. And simply keep > the current 3.0 Alpha tag on the frameworks branch. > > Not need to dump "3.0" in interface to public and waste time/space in the > release notes, chats and interviews/articles on where 3.0 is and why 3.0 was > skipped, where instead features could and should be highlighted :) Unless > anyone can tell if there could be a great promotion spin done out of that? > ;) > > Internally we have been talking about 3.0 as switch-feature-development-to- > frameworks milestone and 3.1 as first-qt5-based release, but well, we are > smart contributors and can quickly adapt tag labels, right? :) > > Objections? > > Cheers > Friedrich > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel