Terry Moore-Read wrote: > That's basically the way the US Supreme court ruled in the AT&T vs Microsoft > case too. > > >>>> Benny Amorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/24/07 1:32 AM >>> >>>> >>>>>> "SU" == Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> > > SU> So your argument is that if you take any product using patented > SU> techniques and introduce a little software into the process, the > SU> patents magically don't apply in the EU. Somehow I think it would > SU> be hard to argue that one in court. :- ) > > No, the other way around. When the product is purely software, no > hardware involved, the patents do not apply in the EU. > >
The US Supreme Court said nothing of the sort. How could they possibly be ruling on what is and is not legal in the EU? Regards, Steve _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
