Ming-Wei Shih wrote:
> Anthony Messina wrote:
>> a modern handset?  sure, but what do you mean by that; the "modern"
>> handsets i have are not really shaped at all, but are more stick-shaped
>> or rectangular like cell-phones, with a much less-distinctive
>> handle/earpiece/mouthpiece.  perhaps i'm picturing it wrong, but i think
>> it'd be hard to work that into a "C" for the "C"allWeaver.
>>
>> can you send me a link to a phone that you're picturing.
>>
>> i'd like to keep working on this as long as i know there's enough
>> support for it.  i appreciate your feedback xming.
>>   
> You are certainly getting support, this is what coppice said
> 
> <@coppice> I think http://messinet.com/~amessina/projects/callweaver/ 
> needs a much more handset-like handset at each end
> <@coppice> making a C for CallWeaver from the handset might work nicely
> 
> To be honest, I don't have any in mind, I can only complain. The  
> handsets just do not
> look right so I suggested more modern ones. Maybe more 
> stylish/rounded/softer and less
> "hard" will be better.
> 
> If some how you can drop the C and place a handset (which resembles a C) 
> there, I don't
> know just some random thoughts.

thanks.  i'm not as good on irc as you all, so i miss some things.  i'll
try a few things and repost.  and i do appreciate the feedback.

-- 
Anthony -  http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Callweaver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users

Reply via email to