Other than the trademark registered name of Asterisk, I understand when we
forked we went to OGI, but is it really needed? Can't we just improve AGI?
I'm sure citats wouldn't mind changes and improvements to the Asterisk::AGI
code?

-wasim

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Waba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> First of all, I upgraded callweaver-perl using asterisk-perl 0.10 (it
> was based on 0.09). I'd appreciate some feedback on this (ticket #343).
>
> Now I'm working on a partial rewrite of CallWeaver::OGI - using CPAN
> modules and automethods, I've cut the code size by 50%, improved its
> readability and grown the documentation to 200% for good balance :-)
>
> I've still got to write a real testsuite and I'll be ready to send a
> patch. However, I'm wondering if this is really the best course of
> action. This will definitively fork the Asterisk::AGI module, and
> without contacting the original author first I'm not sure it is even
> needed.
>
> Indeed, as far as I can tell the only difference between Asterisk::AGI
> and CallWeaver::OGI is the prefix used to pass variables around
> (agi_$name: $value vs. ogi_$name: $value). This could easily be
> configured at runtime rather than through a complete fork.
>
> Has someone tried to contact James Golovich about it? Should I? While
> waiting for your answers I'll get that testsuite done - my work would
> fit just as well in a unified Asterisk::AGI than in CallWeaver::OGI.
>
> -Waba.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHzTss3FzfxAeN+kERAp6LAJ99Zx23+/BRivXvlw3kLf1WFOgyXgCfd2bA
> YDNtBIeh/IdQQIl1ZtsIbpM=
> =oT5T
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callweaver-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
>
>


-- 
wasim h. baig | principal consultant | convergence pk | +92 300 8508070
_______________________________________________
Callweaver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users

Reply via email to