I've never "used" callweaver beyond (attempting) testing the broken T38Gateway. The day it works I might consider switching. For now I'll keep on using Asterisk. Digium generally don't add features that are broken and remain that way for years.... usually they release these things called bugfixes.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Michael Labuschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Deswegen würd ich nicht auf callweaver wechseln wollen.... > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Andreas van > dem Helge > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. März 2008 15:47 > An: Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Betreff: Re: [Callweaver-users] Cannot manage T38Gateway to work > > > > You are doing nothing wrong. It's just broken feature.... been broken > for a while, too. > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Marek Zelem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I want to replace Asterisk with Callweaver because I need reliable > > faxing. I have ISDN BRI intefrace working through chan_capi in Callweaver > > (svn 1.2) and I have fax machine connected via SIP ATA with T38 support. > > I need incoming and outgoing faxes working over T38, so Callweaver > > working as T38 Gateway between chan_capi and T38 SIP. If I understand the > > documentation correctly this should work but probably I am doing > something > > wrong. > > > > In sip.conf I have: > > t38udptlsupport=yes > > t38rtpsupport=yes > > (In both, general section and in my ATA fax section - I do not know > > whether I need to repeate it in ATA fax section, in Asterisk it is > > required) > > > > Extensions.conf: > > [isdn_incoming_context] > > exten => xxx,1,T38Gateway(SIP/atafax) > > > > [atafax_context] > > exten => _0.,1,T38Gateway(CAPI/ISDN1/${EXTEN},600,W) > > > > Actualy I wanted to do something more complex but to get it work I > > started with simplest thing. > > > > When I am sending or receiving fax I am getting 'rtp.c: Unknown RTP codec > > 100 received' message and of course faxing is very unreliable. As far as > I > > know, this message in asterisk means that ATA tried to switch to T38 and > > support of T38 is off. I don't understand it deeply, just know that this > > occures when you have 't38pt_udptl=no' in asterisk. > > > > I was also playing with SipT38SwitchOver() and the result was even worse. > > I was flooded with following messages: > > chan_capi.c: ISDN1#02: failed to fill smoother > > frame.c: Smoother was working on 8 format frames, now trying to feed 64? > > > > Can you please tell me what I am doing wrong? > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Marek > > _______________________________________________ > > Callweaver-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Callweaver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users > > _______________________________________________ > Callweaver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users > _______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
