Eugene Prokopiev ha scritto:
> Hi,
> 
> Are recomendations from http://www.callweaver.org/wiki/Kernel still valid?
> 
> I can't see warnings with kernel 2.6.18 with CONFIG_HZ=250 and I can't
> see timer.c via http://www.callweaver.org/browse. It's looks like
> CallWeaver works without significant problems.

it has never been a requirement.
It has always been an improvement.
The lack of precision of timing doesn't prevent CW from working.
But a better timing precision improves audio streams.

Max
_______________________________________________
Callweaver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users

Reply via email to