Hi Ken, Ciscos are fine if you get the right firmware revision. However, they seem to have produced a number of broken T.38 revisions.
Regards, Steve Ken Rice wrote: > AS5300's are cheap and super reliable... And its recommended... A AS5300 > only does up to 4 E1/T1s and you can find them configured for 1 or 2 E1s > regularly... > > > >> From: Jakob Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion >> <[email protected]> >> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:31:55 +0200 >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: [Callweaver-users] Recommendation for media gateway (with T.38 >> support) >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm in the process of setting up a new CallWeaver machine (with version >> 1.2.0.1 or probably .2) for receiving voice- and faxmessages. I have to >> connect it to two PRI (E1/S2M) links (one media gateway per link for >> redundancy). >> Are there any recommendations for media gateways that work well with >> CallWeaver, in particular with its T.38 fax receiver? I read some people >> here are using a Cisco AS5300, but that seems a little too big for our >> purpose. >> _______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
