Thank you Steve for concern! Yes actually we tried to play with different options, BUT without much success. Again the numbers below are approximative, so not even pretend to be statistically correct.
The thing that lacks in my understanding of foip with callweaver is some HOWTO or WIKI on callweaver tunning, profound error analysis techniques, good statistics based on logs (like mailgraph) and some others. Any ideas on this! 2010/4/2 Steve Underwood <ste...@coppice.org> > On 04/01/2010 08:19 PM, Igor Moiseev wrote: > > Hi Richard! We deployed one faxserver with callweaver and mean values > > are the following > > > > Sent faxes about 400/week with error on sending about 10% > > Received faxes about 1400/week about 15% of errors > > > > Percents are not very real, because it includes any type of error also > > phone number does not exist, phone number error etc. > > So the real statistic should give about 5-7% of errors. > > > > The system with dual core processor and 2Gb of ram is > > able easily manage this load. > > The pick we registered is about 14:00 - 15:00 on weekdays and it could > > be 10-15 simultaneous faxes, mix of receiving and sending. > > > People use boxes like that to send 100k FAXes per day, and the failure > rate (the real failure rate - the calls which had the potential to > complete and didn't) should be below 1%. On a public FAX server 15 to > 20% call failures are quite typical, because of all the wrong numbers, > people hitting FAX who expected to be hitting voice mail, etc. If your > real failure rate is much more than 1% you may have timing issues in > your system. > > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > Callweaver-users mailing list > Callweaver-users@callweaver.org > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users >
_______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list Callweaver-users@callweaver.org http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
