Hi, On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Steve Hill <st...@nexusuk.org> wrote: > > Is Asterisk still dependent on the Zaptel timers? That was one of the > reasons I started using Callweaver in the first place - a dislike of > having to use extra kernel modules to pretend to be hardware I'm never > going to buy rather than simply using the standard timers provided by the > kernel.
Asterisk have done some good job solving this issue. You are not bounded with zap timer device anymore, so you can easily deploy it in virtual servers. I think that Callweaver was relevant some years ago when there were big problems with asterisk but now, the future is asterisk side (Disclaimer: I have deployed Callweaver and it is still working great, so no offense to dev team who did a very good job! But for my new projects I have switched back to asterisk.) I have no opinion with Freeswitch as I have not worked with it (I was a bit repelled with the xml config syntax...). The best advice is to go what you are familiar with, depending on your needs. Hope this will help. Regards, - vma. _______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list Callweaver-users@callweaver.org http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
