>From a 3 meg radio to a 35 meg radio, I sure would say so.

Or if you go bonkers can do 20 MHz, 100 meg.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:04 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]>
wrote:

> FSK problem customers? You mean like.. all of them? Customers that we
> swap to 900 450i say it's night and day difference.
>
> Granted, we don't have our 450i's all that loaded up yet. We're bound to
> get crappy/variable SM links, but it's still better than FSK. This is
> why we very much need air-time fairness for the 450, especially the 900.
> I don't want to poke Cambium too much about it, or much more than I
> already have, but it's necessary, and I hope it makes it into 15.x
> somewhat soon. Early/mid-spring would be great. Ya know, when the leaves
> start coming back.
>
> On 1/27/2017 10:20 PM, Jay Weekley wrote:
> > That's encouraging.  Would you say that some of your FSK problem
> > customers, if any, have improved?
> >
> > George Skorup wrote:
> >> Funny you should ask actually. Every customer we've swapped from FSK,
> >> mostly w/ KP 17dBi yagis, has gained 5-6dB downlink power level. We've
> >> been using some of the Cambium OEM 12's and a few of the new KP 14's
> >> to compare. I haven't yet figured out why. It's weird. Perhaps the
> >> 450i transmitter is just moar bettar. Or the FSK APs we have up just
> suck.
> >>
> >> Is Ken on this list? I know he's done some FSK to 450i swaps. I wonder
> >> if he's seen any difference in power levels.
> >>
> >> On 1/27/2017 9:26 PM, Jay Weekley wrote:
> >>> How are the signals comparing when you migrate from FSK to the 4501?
> >>>
> >>> George Skorup wrote:
> >>>> I think I posted this over on the AF list earlier this week. We set
> >>>> up a 900 450i AP with an H and a V omni to convert a 4x90 H-pol FSK
> >>>> site with ~20 customers. 5MHz channel, 5ms and configured as close
> >>>> as I could get it to sync with the FSK.
> >>>>
> >>>> Added a couple more customers this week. SMs have all been installed
> >>>> slant and they work perfectly fine. The uplinks aren't so good with
> >>>> the noise, but I'm actually quite surprised at how well it's
> >>>> working, especially seeing the 6X and 8X downlinks. Hopefully the
> >>>> uplinks will improve as we get more FSK off the air.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Cambium-users mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No virus found in this message.
> >>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature>
> >>>> Version: 2016.0.7998 / Virus Database: 4749/13851 - Release Date:
> >>>> 01/27/17
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Cambium-users mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cambium-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
> >>
> >>
> >> No virus found in this message.
> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature>
> >> Version: 2016.0.7998 / Virus Database: 4749/13851 - Release Date:
> 01/27/17
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cambium-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cambium-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users
>
_______________________________________________
Cambium-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/cambium-users

Reply via email to