<http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2008/08/sam-rainsy-and-kem-sokhas-letter-to.ht
ml> Sam Rainsy and Kem Sokha's letter to Indonesia's president S. B.
Yudhoyono regarding the 1991 Paris Agreements on Cambodia 



 
<http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_76xUgRgjZYM/SLWBSdgIZhI/AAAAAAAAGDg/xMbPvCf8F-M/s
1600-h/Kem+Sokha-Sam+Rainsy-Mu+Sochua+%28Ung+Chamroeun,+CSH%29.jpg> Kem
Sokha (L), Sam Rainsy (C) and Mu Sochua (R) (Photo: Ung Chamroeun, Cambodge
Soir Hebdo)


August 27, 2008


His Excellency Mr. Sulilo Bambang Yudhoyono
President of Indonesia
Jakarta
Indonesia

By kindness of
Mr. Eko Indiarto
Chargé d'Affaires a.i.
Indonesia Embassy
1, Street 466
Phnom Penh
Cambodia

Mr. President Yudhoyono,

As presidents of Cambodia's second and third largest political parties which
should form the parliamentary opposition in the new legislature (2008-2013),
following the July 27 election, we are taking the liberty of writing to you,
especially because Indonesia was co-president, with France, of the Paris
International Conference on Cambodia, which led to the signing of the Paris
Peace Agreements of October 23, 1991.

We wish to bring to your attention the extent to which political
developments in Cambodia have departed dangerously from the path laid out in
the Paris Agreements.

In general terms, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the
United Nations for Human Rights in Cambodia, Mr. Yash Ghai, accurately
described the situation by underscoring that “The use of systemic human
rights violations has been a rational choice for those who hold power in
Cambodia, and who refuse to accept accountability vis-à-vis the law and the
people of Cambodia.” (Report of the Special Representative of the
Secretary-General for human rights in Cambodia , Yash Ghai, UN Doc.
A/HRC/4/36, 30 January 2007 , para. 93.). He further underlines that “The
above analysis shows that laws, institutions, procedures critical to the
rule of law are very little respected in Cambodia - especially by the
State.” ( Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for
human rights in Cambodia, Yash Ghai, UN Doc. A/HCR/7/42, 29 February 2008 ,
para. 52). On 19 March 2008 , Mr. Yash Ghai, speaking in Geneva about the
Cambodian elections, which were a little over four months away, doubts it
was possible to hold “free and fair” elections as long as “serious obstacles
[remain] to achieving the goal of political pluralism through elections.”
For Mr. Ghai, some of these obstacles are “irregularities in the
administration of elections that favoured the ruling party.”

Regular reporting by Mr. Yash Ghai and his predecessors has made it very
clear that ever since the truly democratic elections organized by the UN in
1993 pursuant to the Paris Agreements, all that is left of the democracy put
in place in Cambodia , at great costs to the international community, is a
cracking façade.

Since the 1993 elections, each election has been more and more manipulated
by the Cambodian People's Party (CPP), in power since 1979, resulting in an
ever more perverted democracy, as recognized by all independent national and
international organizations.

Predictably, the elections of last July 27 were dubious at best, as
recognized by the European Union Observation Mission in its July 29
statement which points that “2008 National Assembly Elections have fallen
short of a number of key international standards for democratic elections.”
(The European Union Election Observation Mission, Preliminary Statement,
Cambodian elections 2008 show some progress but still fall short of key
international standards, 29 July 2008 , Phnom Penh .)

Every day brings more proof of electoral fraud of national scale. We would
like to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the long-term observers of
the European Union, some of whom are still in Cambodia today to follow up
with progress and the handling of electoral complaints. Electoral experts of
the UN Development Program (UNDP) who are in Cambodia , are also in a
position to provide an accurate evaluation of the whole electoral process
which spreads out over more than two years. They were the only ones to
witness all aspects of fraud which took place at all stages of the electoral
process, beginning with the manipulation of the voter list as early as
2006-2007.

Even though the 2008 elections were less marred by violence than previous
elections and hence "show some progress", fraud this year took on a more
sophisticated or more subtle form and was conducted on a much wider scale.
Under the pretext of “cleaning up” voter lists, the National Election
Committee (NEC), which is controlled by the CPP, deliberately did the
opposite of what it should have done: the NEC deleted names that should have
remained on the lists and kept names that should have been deleted. The NEC
deleted hundreds of thousands of names of bona fide voters, known to be
unfavorable to the CPP, and kept hundreds of thousands of names of ghost
voters in order to build up a reserve of fraudulent votes for the CPP. The
outcome was that hundreds of thousands of persons without the right to vote
(citizens not registered on the lists of the residential commune, or
underage, or foreigners) were able to vote by using forged documents which
were methodically provided to them by local authorities controlled by the
CPP by using names of these ghost voters. The NEC has in fact killed three
birds with one stone: it has succeeded in cleverly reducing the opposition's
votes to a large extent, fraudulently inflated the CPP's votes to the same
extent, and maintained a decent rate of "voter" turnout.

We have gathered an increasing amount of evidence of such manipulation of
electoral lists, which we have published on our website
http://tinyurl.com/4eegak . The evidence presented is largely what
short-term and inexperienced observers could not see in a sophistically
rigged election.

This systematic and massive electoral fraud seriously discredits the results
of the July 27, 2008 election, giving a "landslide victory" to the CPP,
recently proclaimed by the NEC but not really reflecting the will of the
Cambodian people. This type of fake election is in violation of the Paris
Agreements which call for Cambodia “to provide for periodic and genuine
elections” as well as "the right to vote and to be elected by universal and
equal suffrage." The Agreements also call for Cambodia to ensure that
"electoral procedures provide a full and fair opportunity" for all citizens
to "participate in the electoral process." ( Paris Agreements, Annex 5).

We deplore that election procedures established and implemented by the NEC
did not provide a "full and fair opportunity to participate in the electoral
process" and that a significant portion of the

electorate was denied "the right to vote by universal and equal suffrage."
In short, the 2008 election was not "genuine" and is not in line with the
spirit and the letter of the Paris Agreements.

Because we want to remain true to the principles of popular sovereignty and
political honesty, we have made it known that, so long as our electoral
complaints are not reasonably resolved, we will not take part in the
swearing-in ceremony scheduled for September 24 by the CPP. This ceremony
would normally be presided over by His Majesty the King. In fact, we would
not wish to find ourselves in such a solemn occasion, in the presence of at
least fifteen MPs elect from the CPP whom we and many independent observers
consider as unfairly and fraudulently elected.

An acceptable resolution of a number of our electoral complaints should be
through the holding of a re-vote or, at least, a vote recount in a limited
number of constituencies (provinces or municipalities) where the opposition
has come very close to winning an additional parliamentary seat according to
figures provided by the NEC. However, the NEC, which is both judge and
judged, has rejected practically all our complaints. Even the most important
ones were only “examined” behind closed doors and very quickly dismissed as
“groundless”. As of today, the NEC has not allowed a single vote recount,
let alone a re-vote, even when first reports of ballot counting from a given
polling station conflict with each other and some of these reports seem to
have been doctored. When the opposition submits a complaint with some
evidence raising some doubt, why doesn't the NEC accept to jointly with the
plaintiffs recount the ballots from any given ballot box from any given
polling station so as to dissipate any doubt? Are they afraid that a vote
recount even for a single ballot box from a single polling station – there
are 15, 254 polling stations nationwide – could reveal anomalies/
irregularities that could be indicative of broader fraud commune-wide,
province-wide and nationwide? The Constitutional Council, which is another
CPP-controlled institution acting as a kind of Supreme Court, has so far
upheld all the NEC's decisions to dismiss the opposition's complaints. There
is apparently no other reasons for the two institutions for not allowing any
vote recount than the fear to see the CPP's "landslide victory" evaporate
following proper verifications.

The CPP has made it publicly known that if we did not participate in the
above-mentioned swearing-in ceremony, on the set day, it would deprive us of
our 29 parliamentary seats and would redistribute them to the CPP, which has
already "won" 90 seats (out of 123 seats), and to two small CPP- satellite
parties which have already obtained two seats each. If the CPP were to
effectively act on its threat, there would no longer be any parliamentary
opposition in our country, which would further and in a serious manner
contradict the Paris Agreements which require Cambodia to “follow a system
of liberal democracy, on the basis of pluralism.” (Annex 5).

In conclusion, we wish to reiterate our most profound gratitude to the
people and the government of Indonesia for their continued and vigilant
support for the cause of liberty, human rights and democracy in Cambodia .
The Cambodian people do look up to Indonesia as a model of democracy in
South-East Asia , especially under the leadership of her current President.

Respectfully yours,

Sam Rainsy
President of the Sam Rainsy Party
MP elect following the July 27, 2008 election

Kem Sokha 
President of the Human Rights Party
MP elect following the July 27, 2008 election
 
Letter in English, please click at link below :
 
<http://www.samrainsyparty.org/srp_statements/statments_08/august/080827_let
ter_to_indonesia.htm>
http://www.samrainsyparty.org/srp_statements/statments_08/august/080827_lett
er_to_indonesia.htm
 
Letter in French, please click at link below :
http://www.samrainsyparty.org/srp_statements/statments_08/august/080825_lett
er_to_france.htm
 
 
 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<attachment: Kem+Sokha-Sam+Rainsy-Mu+Sochua+(Ung+Chamroeun,+CSH).jpg>>

Reply via email to