While the age of empire has ended, imperialism has never ended. It is also
so true when it comes to the yuon imperialism.


A MR not by the Windsor




On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Ông-thu N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  *W*hat has happened to the common sense of Americans? Has it completely
> gone down the drain with the propaganda of U.S. superiority?
>
> Don't they see the millions and millions of people who have died and are
> still dying across the world, due to U..S. empire illusions and the firmly
> established greed and power of the Big Corporations? Don't they see that the
> lone superpower as a taken-for-granted is a fiction?
>
> Yes, the United States was once a powerful nation, and a nation that people
> in the world looked up to, but it lost all its good points on the
> aggressive stand all over the world. Its go-it-alone,
> we're-the-leaders-of-the-world mentality is the way this 'superpower' has
> been living it up at least since World War II. The more it has been crushing
> and killing, the more it has lost its credibility in the world. The more its
> corporations intruded on the sovereignty of other states, the faster did
> this country lose its favorable standing in the world.
>
> And Americans themselves, how do they see the world at this point? From a
> distance it seems as if they are beginning to open their eyes. One big BUT
> however. The everyday American is not capable of giving up on his deeply
> indoctrinated faith that the United States is the greatest country in the
> world. They 'know' that they are basically moral, highly civilized, good
> people who want to confer their way of life to the whole world since the
> rest of the world is so uncivilized, so poor, living in such precarious
> conditions.
>
> There is no doubt in their minds that the United States is the foremost
> democracy in the world. Since they don't know anything about the rest of the
> world, it's easy to propagandize them into believing just about anything you
> want to make them believe. And besides, don't the every-two-year elections
> prove that they are the ones who select the leaders and so they have a voice
> in what's being done in their names? A majority of U.S. citizens are most
> certainly taken in by the belief that they participate in the running of the
> country.
>
> It's doubtful if there are many Americans who see the National conventions
> that have just started as the fool's gold that they are. The most expensive
> circus that ever was and that the people pay dearly for.. Just another
> Disney World to fool the people into believing that something important is
> going on and that they matter. "We don't have a moment to lose or a vote to
> spare," [Hillary] Clinton said. "Nothing less than the fate of our nation
> and the future of our children hangs in the balance." [1]
>
> What is hanging in the balance is hard to see since both presidential
> candidates are saying pretty much the same things, except that their styles
> are different. Ok, Obama/Hillary now say Healthcare for all, but that is to
> be seen once the corporations get into the game. The arms manufacturers
> telling the new administration what they 'need', the HMO's, the
> pharmaceutical industry, all the corporate giants telling them of their sine
> qua non. Nothing so far has indicated in the least that either Hillary or
> Obama is against privatization or the free market. Disaster capitalism, as
> Naomi Klein says, is the name of the system and democracy is the victim.
> Regulation is a non-concept. How can corporations develop and maximize
> profit if they are being regulated? Starve the people but don't you ever
> think of strangling the corporations that are making the world go round.
> Profit is king and the people be damned.
>
> So how do Americans see their country's criminal aggressions and the
> callous greed? First of all, greed is a good thing in the American credo.
> God rewards the hard workers and the ones left behind have no reason to
> complain. Socialism is a dirty word and welfare is only good when it's for
> the benefit of the Big Corporations.
>
> Instead of seeing that the United States invades or buys every country that
> does not agree with their methods of running business, the gullible U.S.
> citizen is firmly convinced that the U.S. comes to the aid of every country
> when it is in trouble. They support the evil dictator and things calm down.
> Nobody ever lets them know that what the U.S. is doing is in the interest of
> its own global hegemony and that the indigenous people are beaten down and
> suffering even worse after the United States gets in on the side of the
> dictator. For every social uprising in Central America, from the
> CIA-orchestrated coup in 1954 in Guatemala on through the Reagan years, the
> United States has intervened with an iron fist, bombing and killing, usually
> through mercenary death squads, until the leftist struggle for justice is
> totally crushed and the U.S.-supported dictatorship can go on doing the
> bidding of the Empire.
>
> Inside the United States, the increasing inequality and vanishing civil
> rights are forcefully backed up by the Big Corporations who see that state
> of things as the only way of meeting their goal of ever increasing dividends
> to the shareholders and multi-million bonuses to the CEOs. Furthermore, this
> is the way of life that is considered by them as the normal way of running
> the economy. Ethics do not exist. Those who were born to grab from the
> others will do so no matter what they were taught in Sunday school about
> doing good to their neighbor.
>
> So why don't the U.S. governments try to rein in the greedy corporations?
> Because the corporations are the ones who run the show, who tell the
> so-called rulers what to do – in all countries more or less, not just in the
> United States. The lawmakers and the heads of governments are all puppets
> dancing on strings, unless the so-called rulers actually have a foot in each
> camp. They pretend to run the country but they are actually looking after
> the corporations they are tied to and their own interests. In this last
> administration, this has been the case more than ever before.
>
> It is certainly not in the interest of the ruling elite to give in to
> demands of fair treatment from the poor sections of society or even from the
> middle class. Starving the beast is a prerequisite for controlling the
> populace, for setting the rules of the game. A population that is ignorant,
> apathetic from tiredness and overwork, dumbed down from infotainment and
> antiseptic television shows – that is exactly what suits the greedy money
> makers. No insurgency, since there's no energy left for such a thing as a
> fight for better conditions. No knowledge about the rest of the world, and
> so Americans can go on believing that they are the best, no matter what the
> rest of the world might feel about that unquestioned rule of faith.. So the
> world doesn't love us any more. It's because of the war in Iraq. It's that
> simple.
>
> Creeping totalitarianism, the people losing one civil right after the
> other, and their voices not being heard or paid attention to. This is what
> has become of 'America the beautiful'. And all the while through non-stop
> propaganda the citizens are made to believe that they live in a democracy.
>
> In this police state there is no need to make Jews scrub the sidewalks.
> There is no need for ostentatiously depriving a section of the population of
> their freedoms and making them the scapegoats. Poverty will serve the
> purpose of creating a marginal group that can be exploited.. No need for arm
> bands with the star of David. The poor people and in particular the
> immigrants have their backs sufficiently bent to serve the ever-existing
> need of a class to look down on. In spite of the age-old history of racism
> in America, this is not a war on race, it's a class war, and it's getting
> more and more extreme. The so-called free trade system, which is far from
> free, is only benefiting Big Money.
>
> Desperate poverty has been increasing all over the world ever since the
> organizations that set the rules for the economies of third world countries
> promised to solve the crisis of hunger and poverty in the world. In fact,
> what they were gearing up to do was finish off the plunder of the poor
> countries that depended on their high-interest loans. You might well ask
> yourselves if this neocolonialism is not even more disastrous for the
> third-world countries than the former kind that was very gradually ended
> after World War II, at least in a legal sense.
>
> 9/11 was a windfall for the neocons since, whoever orchestrated it, it
> paved the way for the totalitarianism that we are now witnessing. It made
> the invention of the 'war on terror' possible.. A war president can allow
> himself to commit aggression in the name of the people that would meet with
> violent protests in a peaceful era. Fear is the ever efficient means of
> keeping a population under control.
>
> Little did they see that the ambitions of the neocons went much farther
> than the invasion and occupation of Iraq and the control of its oil
> resources. The aim was much higher. To begin with they wanted control of the
> whole Greater Middle East. Then what was going to follow was clearly control
> of the planet and possibly outer space. However, it now seems obvious that
> their ambitions will be cut short, since other big powers are rearing their
> heads in different parts of the world.
>
> Also the 'war on terror' has been proven to be a worn-out cliché, a
> nonsense word, mainly because all this so-called war is doing is increasing
> the resistance to the United States and its aggressive march across the
> world's continents. Even the U.S. citizens are aware of this counter-effect.
>
> So what the neocon regime is now aiming at is a renewal of the cold war.
> Russia is going to be the enemy No.1 once again. They make the people
> believe that things are calming down in the Middle East. Iraq is moving
> towards a democracy, is what they try to make people believe. What is
> happening in Afghanistan and Pakistan is hushed up. They have the media on
> their side, which has of course been essential in winning the support of the
> people that they have had so far.
>
> The question is now: Will le capitalisme sauvage (as the French say) win
> the life or death game or will the people finally gather strength and a
> voice and manage to throw them out? To the corporations it's a game, to the
> people it's a matter of sheer survival.
>
> All the ballyhoo about the American dream is just that and as for Bill
> Clinton's words about restor[ing] America's standing in the world [2],
> that's for megalomaniacs and dreamers. We will be lucky if the planet
> survives, and it will take the rising up of the people, a forceful attack on
> the prevailing corporate system by the people all over the world to make
> that happen. The world is under attack from U.S. corporatism, ecology,
> economy, inequality, injustice, and it's not just American citizens who have
> to speak out and act out. It's the people of the world.
>
> Notes
>
> [1] Steven Rosenfeld: Hillary Electrifies: "Nothing Less Than the Fate of
> Our Nation … Hangs in the Balance"
>
> [2] Bill Clinton at the Democratic National Convention on August 27, 2008 -
> exact quote: "Clearly, the job of the next President is to rebuild the
> American Dream and restore America's standing in the world."
>
> Siv O'Neall is an Axis of Logic columnist, based in France. She can be
> reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> >
>


-- 
MR,






















Khlean + Khlao + Khlach = Khmer

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to