What John McCain Should Know
John McCain should know. More than any other candidate for president, John
McCain should know that peace talks can be stronger and smarter than bombs,
that withdrawing American soldiers can be the best way to achieve stability,
and that the best way to protect American troops is to bring them home from the
war zone.
John McCain should know, because he has lived this experience. After being held
for nearly six years and tortured in a North Vietnamese prison, Lt. Cmdr. John
McCain was freed—not by a daring commando raid on an enemy compound but by a
negotiated settlement arrived at in peace talks in Paris. President Richard
Nixon agreed to remove U.S. troops from Vietnam within 60 days, and the North
Vietnamese government agreed to release American POWs like McCain as those
troops were withdrawn.
John McCain should know that no one wins in the destruction of war. Even before
he was shot down during a bombing run over Hanoi, the admiral’s son had
questioned the human costs of armed conflict. In 1967, after McCain nearly died
following a massive weapons malfunction and fire in the Gulf of Tonkin, the
young Navy man told New York Times reporter R.W. Apple: “It’s a difficult thing
to say. But now that I’ve seen what the bombs and the napalm did to the people
on our ship, I’m not so sure that I want to drop any more of that stuff on
North Vietnam.”
John McCain should know that yesterday’s enemy can be tomorrow’s ally and that
alliances can be struck even after the United States is defeated on the field
of battle. During the 1980s, McCain was one of the strongest advocates of
establishing diplomatic relations with Communist Vietnam at a time when leaders
of both political parties feared an angry backlash for simply talking to the
other side.
In 1985, John McCain traveled to Hanoi to see Communist Vietnam for himself. He
understood the value of putting the past behind him.
“When I arrived in Hanoi, I was excited to learn that my hosts had arranged for
me a night’s rest at Ho [Chi Minh]’s villa in exotic Ha Long Bay,” McCain wrote
in his 2002 memoir, “Worth Fighting For.” “As I ... laid my head on the pillow
in the bed, in the house where Ho had slept, I knew I had received all the
recompense I was likely to get for the nights in Vietnam I had spent in less
comfortable circumstances many years ago. There was nothing more I could gain
revisiting the war with my former enemies. Better to enjoy the evening and in
the morning see to more promising pursuits, among which was helping to build a
relationship with Vietnam that would serve both our peoples better than the old
one had.”
The John McCain of the 1980s and ’90s was a true warrior for peace. Working
together with another Vietnam vet, Democrat John Kerry of Massachusetts, he
helped disprove the saber rattlers’ contention that Hanoi still kept thousands
of American POWs in secret camps. He did this by bridging the gap between
high-ranking Pentagon and Communist officials, people who had been shooting at
each other just a few years before.
In 1994 the Senate passed a resolution, sponsored by Sens. Kerry and McCain,
that called for an end to a U.S. trade embargo against Vietnam. “The vote will
give the president the kind of political cover he needs to lift the embargo,
and I expect that relatively soon,” McCain told The New York Times. “I think
it’s a seminal event in U.S.-Vietnamese relations.”
In 1995, when President Bill Clinton normalized diplomatic relations with
Vietnam, John McCain was in the room.
Where is that John McCain today? He now talks about keeping the U.S. in Iraq
for 100 years and seems to have no conception of the hardship and pain American
bombing raids have on the Iraqi people. Where is the maverick’s spirit of
truth-telling when it comes to the lies the Bush administration told to get us
into this war?
Today, McCain angrily calls out his Democratic rivals, arguing that they
advocate an “arbitrary timetable” for withdrawal from Iraq “which recklessly
ignores the profound human calamity and dire threats to our security that would
ensue.”
John McCain should know better, because the history of the Vietnam War (and his
involvement in it) shows that while peace takes time, it starts with the
withdrawal of the U.S. military.
When the U.S. left Vietnam in 1975, the situation was indeed tragic; more than
400,000 people were rounded up by the victorious Communists and thrown into
“re-education camps.” More than a million didn’t await that fate and fled by
boat as refugees. The country’s economy remained a shambles and was isolated
from the outside world. The same seems in store for Iraq when we leave.
But those setbacks were temporary and could not have been prevented by
additional bombing runs or a “surge” of American troops. Indeed, the main thing
that brought progress in Southeast Asia was the courage of people like John
McCain—those who understood that America can achieve more through tradethan it
can through war and that tough diplomacy can achieve what a thousand bombing
runs cannot.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
