Also posted at www.modernprogressivekhmer.blogspot.com

For most of my adult life, I have tried to reconcile the conundrum of
the so-called Cambodia’s “liberation.”  The war of 1979 and its
aftermath generate this lingering question whether the war was an
invasion or liberation.  Can we move beyond this debate?  I think we
can and we should.

It would be easy to decide if the warring parties were all foreign
forces against Cambodian’s. The complexity increases exponentially
when Cambodians collaborated with the invasion forces.  Battalions of
the Khmer Resistance Force of the United Front for National Salvation
of Kampuchea (UFNSK) fought side by side with the Vietnamese forces.

Was it an invasion or a liberation?

To Vietnam it was a conquest and an invasion.  It was Vietnam’s
Machiavellian approach to settling disputes between its weaker
neighbors. What were border skirmishes between the former allies
during the Vietnam War against the U.S. became a full-blown war
between Vietnam and the Democratic Kampuchea (DK) as the two nations
deeply divided between the Soviet and the Chinese camp.

“In September [of 1978] Le Duan made the timing of the Vietnamese plan
clear when he told the Soviet Ambassador to Vietnam that the
Vietnamese Politburo had decided ‘to solve fully this question [of
Cambodia] by the beginning of 1979,’” according to Merle L. Pribbenow
II, a former CIA agent and a Vietnam expert, who hailed the invasion
as “one of the most seminal events of the last half century in South
East Asia.”

To the UFNSK may have been a rescue mission or a liberation.

In my mind, the war would have been a liberation if it was conceived
and planned by the leadership of UFNSK.  The UFNSK was promulgated as
a resistance force in Snoul, Kratie on December 2, 1978 by which time
the Vietnamese generals had meticulously planned the war, and the
preparations for war were already completed. While it is conceivable
that the Vietnamese generals may have consulted with its Cambodian
counterparts, the records, thus far, showed that the Vietnamese
generals were the brains behind the invasion.

In “ The Tale of the Five Generals,” Pribbenow II described the war
planning and execution in breath taking details. “The Vietnamese army
spent all of 1978 drafting and training new recruits, calling up
reservists, rebuilding under strength units, and converting military
‘economic construction’ groups back into regular combat units.”

Diplomatically, Vietnam made an informed calculation.  To avoid
fighting two wars at the same time, knowing that China would send
troops to defend Phnom Penh if victory cannot be achieved
expeditiously, the Commander of the General Staff, General Le Trong
Tan and Party Secretary Le Duan traveled to inform the Soviet Union of
the war plan in the summer of 1978.

“ The only way China could stop Vietnam would be to send large numbers
of Chinese Troops to defend Cambodia” Duan told the Soviet
ambassador.

The next month, according to Pribbenow II, when the Soviet diplomat
expressed concern over the possibility that Chinese would block the
invasion, Senior Vietnamese Party official already concluded that
China would not have enough time to dispatch large military units to
rescue Cambodia.

The war was scheduled to begin on January 1,1979. The KR made a
preemptive move by attacking Vietnam on December 21 and 22 of 1978.
The Vietnamese and UFNSK force responded and capture Phnom Penh on
January 7, 1979.

The Khmer Rouge’s systematic killing of its citizens made an invasion
a welcome relief for many Cambodians.

On the one hand, the invasion stopped the killing.  Without the
invasion, the alternative could have been very gloom for many
Cambodians. Clearly, the U.S. could not have rescued Cambodians from
the KR – the Vietnam War was too fresh for the U.S to return to the
region; the Soviet Union was already Vietnam’s staunchest ally; and
China supported the KR.

On the other hand, the invasion has been a constant source of
criticism and mistrust for the current government many of whose
members served in the UFNSK that became the government of Cambodia
after the 1979 invasion.

In the coming weeks, the debates about the war will go on.  As more
and more information about the war is available, I encourage my fellow
Cambodians to read, research for more information, and to come to your
own conclusion.

I have concluded that the war was an invasion, and that the Royal
Government of Cambodia, while pursuing a peaceful and friendly
relation with Vietnam, should be free to determine its own destiny.
Cambodia does not owe Vietnam anything.  Vietnam did what Vietnam had
to do to deal with the DK government.  Vietnam defeated the KR.  It
accomplished its mission.

Cambodia based on its current bilateral relationships with the rest of
the world and especially with China and the U.S. seems to be free of
its neighbor’s influence.  It is up to all of us to find a way to put
our past behind us and to focus on the future.

The prime minister has stated that he will be serving as prime
minister again after the 2013 election.  The implication is Cambodian
People’s Party (CPP) will win again.  The prime minister may be
correct in his prediction if the opposition parties fail to unite and
fail to inspire a simple majority of Cambodians to vote for change.

Based on past performance, it is highly likely that the opposition
parties will fail again unless they are serious about winning by
making drastic changes in the messages and leadership.

With all due respect to prime minister, the picture does not look
quite right when CPP can only come up the same candidate.  And it is
equally sad that the opposition parties keep sticking to the same
strategy with the same leadership election after election.

The future depends on all Cambodians to work together to find a common
ground that moves the country forward.  Cambodia may be poor comparing
to the rest of the world, but it has enough resources and talent to
move Cambodia to be developed nation. Cambodia simply needs to provide
equal opportunity for all to participate in the process.

While election is one of the vehicles to bring change, term limit can
do wonder in spreading the responsibilities to those who are qualified
to serve and to lead the nation.



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to