Chan Kimsrun is a Cambodian.
Kaing Kek Iev, aka Duch, was arrested in 1999. According to the Morphology 
study on race and forensic data nalysis ,Kaing Kek Iev, aka Duch is A 
VIETNAMESE.
 
THE TRUTH WILL SET THE UN TRIBUNAL FREE.
see this Vietnamese woman, Chea Leang, King Sihamoni  allowed her to be 
co-prosecutor in the trial of Khmer rouge .  
DUCH IS A VIETNAMESE, AND CHEA LEANG IS A VIETNAMESE WEARING THE ROBE OF 
"CAMBODIAN" PROSECUTOR, WHAT IS THIS KANGAROO COURT OF KING SIHAMONI ? 
IT MAKES HIM AGAIN THE TRAITOR TO THE CAMBDOIAN PEOPLE. 
KRT prosecutors at impasse Chea Leang(THIS VIETNAMESE WOMAN SMILING 
 
 
Sunday, February 01, 2009

Efforts to Limit Khmer Rouge Trials Decried 



Chan Kimsrun and her child in a photo taken by interrogators at the brutal Tuol 
Sleng prison in Phnom Penh. (Documentation Center of Cambodia, via European 
Pressphoto Agency)
 
 
 

UNDER THE POL POT ERA( 1975-1979) , THIS  VIETNAMESE POSED AS KHMER ROUGE 
CADRE( FROM THE FUNK TROOPS OF SIHANOUK) , SUCH AS DUCH,HOR NAM HONG AND OTHERS 
WHO KILLED A BRITISH CALDWELD .
 








 

 


















Kaing Kek Iev, aka Duch, was arrested in 1999. According to the Morphology 
study on race and forensic data nalysis ,Kaing Kek Iev, aka Duch is A 
VIETNAMESE.
 
BURY
 January 31, 2009By SETH MYDANSThe New York Times
PHNOM PENH, Cambodia — At first glance it seems to be simply a numbers game: 
whether to try 5, 10 or more defendants for the deaths of an estimated 1.7 
million people at the hands of the Khmer Rouge three decades ago.But as a 
United Nations-backed tribunal prepares to hold its first trial hearing this 
month, the wrangle over numbers is reinforcing longstanding concerns about the 
tribunal’s fairness and independence.The Cambodian government, critics say, is 
trying to limit the scope of the trials for its own political reasons, a limit 
that the critics say would compromise justice and could discredit the entire 
process. “To me, it’s the credibility of the tribunal which is at stake, its 
integrity and therefore its credibility,” said Christophe Peschoux, who runs 
the Cambodia office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human 
Rights.The first defendant is the man with perhaps the most horrifying past: 
Kaing Guek Eav, known as Duch (pronounced DOIK), the commander of the Tuol 
Sleng torture house in Phnom Penh, where at least 14,000 people were sent to 
their deaths. His trial is to open with a procedural hearing, set for Feb. 17, 
during which more substantive sessions, involving witnesses and evidence, are 
expected to be scheduled.Four other defendants, all of whom were members of the 
Khmer Rouge Central Committee, are also in custody, waiting their turns to face 
charges on crimes that occurred while they were at the top of the chain of 
command from 1975 to 1979. As much as one-fourth of the population in Cambodia 
died from disease, hunger or overwork, or were executed under the Khmer Rouge’s 
brutal Communist rule.Those five defendants are enough, Cambodian officials 
say.But foreign legal experts counter that within reasonable limits, the 
judicial process should not be arbitrarily limited.After a decade of difficult 
and not always friendly negotiations between the United Nations and the 
Cambodians, a hybrid tribunal is in place, with Cambodian and foreign 
co-prosecutors and co-judges in an awkward political and legal balancing 
act.Now, even before Duch’s trial gets under way, that balance is being 
tested.Last month the foreign co-prosecutor, a Canadian named Robert Petit, 
submitted six more names to the court for investigation, saying that he had 
gathered enough evidence to support possible charges. Mr. Petit’s Cambodian 
counterpart, Chea Leang, objected — not on legal grounds, but for reasons that 
appear to reflect the government’s position on the trials.Additional 
indictments, the Cambodian prosecutor said, could be destabilizing. She said 
they would cost too much, take too long and violate the spirit of the tribunal, 
which she said envisioned “only a small number of trials.”Prime Minister Hun 
Sen, who bargained hard with the United Nations over the shape and scope of the 
tribunal, has said that trying “four or five people” would be enough, although 
there is no formal limit on the number.Indeed, Peter Maguire, author of “Facing 
Death in Cambodia,” suggests that Mr. Hun Sen’s plan might be to try only Duch 
— “a garden-variety war criminal” — and hope the other defendants die before 
they can be tried.The additional names submitted by Mr. Petit have not been 
made public. But people close to the court say that none of them hold a 
significant position in Cambodia’s current government.Mr. Hun Sen and several 
senior members of his government were Khmer Rouge cadres, but experts say they 
do not fall under the scope of the tribunal and are not at risk of 
prosecution.The mandate of the court is to try the top leadership of the Khmer 
Rouge and “those most responsible” for the crimes — that is, people like Duch, 
who is accused of overseeing the torture and killing of thousands.In Cambodia, 
though, courts do not head off in their own directions without tight control 
from Mr. Hun Sen or the people around him. Some advocates of the tribunal, 
called the Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia or E.C.C.C., see it 
as challenging this top-down control by offering Cambodia a model for a more 
independent judiciary.“Some in Phnom Penh are apparently frightened that the 
E.C.C.C. might actually succeed, that it might serve as an example of 
accountability that could be applied more widely,” said James A. Goldston, 
executive director of the Open Society Justice Initiative, a New York-based 
organization that pursues legal reform.“With the Feb. 17 start of the first 
trial fast approaching, now is the moment to show that the court is not a tool 
of the Cambodian government,” he said.Most Cambodians are eager to see Khmer 
Rouge leaders on trial, according to a survey published last week by the Human 
Rights Center at the University of California, Berkeley.But the poll found that 
about one-third of people answering the survey had doubts about the tribunal’s 
neutrality and independence, perhaps because of their experience with their own 
corrupt and coerced judiciary.Confidence in the tribunal has also been eroded 
by allegations of kickbacks that are familiar in the Cambodian court system. 
The United Nations has investigated the allegations but has not released its 
findings.Now, with the dispute between the two co-prosecutors in the open, the 
checks and balances of the hybrid court will meet their first major test.The 
dispute must now go to a panel known as the pretrial chamber, whose makeup 
reflects the supermajority structure of the tribunal — three Cambodian judges 
and two foreign judges.There is nothing so far to suggest that this process 
will not work as it should, said David J. Scheffer, a human rights law 
professor at Northwestern University School of Law who took part in talks to 
create the tribunal.The real test, Mr. Scheffer said in a recent article in The 
Phnom Penh Post, will be whether the judges in the pretrial chamber “step up to 
the plate and do their duty with the highest degree of judicial integrity.”“We 
can all assess that when their decision is rendered,” he said.
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® goes where you go. On a PC, on the Web, on your phone. 
http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/learnmore/versatility.aspx#mobile?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_WL_HM_versatility_121208
 
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to