On Feb 2, 6:10 am, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> Monday, February 2, 2009  Samakii or Soliderity Under Hun Sen's
> Leadership<http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/2009/02/samakii-or-solideri...>
> Hun
> Sen publicly stated that the aged officers should accept to retire
> spontenously in order to provide opportunity for younger capable
> generations. We cannot fully understand his speech is honestly and openly to
> all youths, or it is just his idea to open opportunity for his children.
> However, I support his idea to provide space for younger generations to show
> their ability to build the nation. Those younger generations also include
> his children as well. Children and parents are not generally same, there are
> some distinction inside that imitate relationship, or we can say it should
> be worse or better.
>

Have you ever thought that new generation has beed educated by the
regime for a very long time?
Do you know that those younger generation will bring the country
forward as they know it?
Do you know that CPP and Hun Sen are in all of these movement for a
very long time?
No matter how you perceive it to be, these are facts.


> In this moment, I have heard Hun Sen's public speech mentioned the unity of
> Cambodian people to build the nation following his footsteps. I also support
> this idea of unity or solidarity. But how can Hun Sen articulate this unity
> appealing? If I am not wrong, once he frightened Cambodian people who
> expressed idea to oppose against Vietnam by claiming that he would produce
> them free coffins...so is this relevant for the solidarity to follow Hun
> Sen?
>


Here comes the bread and the butter.
Many Cambodians still think and do as you show it here. Sam Rainsy and
his party are prime example.
Unity doesn't mean that they have to agree with each other completely.
Unity is full participation for a common goal. People from different
angle can have a common goal. Yet, they still have the differences.
Sam Rainsy has no common goal. He only sees his power as the best or
better than Hun Sen and CPP. It means that Hun Sen and CPP are bad for
the country.
My friend,
Hun Sen and CPP members are Cambodians too. They have the rights just
like all Cambodian citizens too. So it's wrong to say that CPP and Hun
Sen are not good while Sam Rainsy is great.
CPP and Sam Rainsy can work together when they put their country
first. Sam Rainsy cannot accept that notion. They want to be THE
OPPOSITION,  the difference.
What does opposition do to the country?
Ofcourse, division will occur. That's exactly what is happening in
Cambodia with Sam Rainsy presence.
Cambodians cannot afford to have destructive force like Sam Rainsy.
They need those who put the country first.
Eventhough, Hun Sen government is very bad. Constructive opposition is
badly needed more than the kind of Sam Rainsy opposition.

> And recently, he ranted his commune representatives at the council meeting
> not to get involved or having relationship with Taiwanese people. What is
> Hun Sen's intention to blame his citizenry in order to draw good attention
> from China? So, is this a good way to follow Hun Sen's solidarity appealing?
>


And your view is..........

> Of course, Hun Sen himself might not update the information that China and
> Taiwan has shook hand to mutually develop and be friend with each other.
> Taiwan is a rich country that their businesses in Cambodia including flights
> to Phnem Penh have created numerous jobs for Cambodian people.
>

Do you think that Hun Sen is that stupid not to know it?


> But why Hun Sen cannot see this benefit? And why Hun Sen is good in
> condemning his own people, but he has always bowed down the foreigners?
>

Hun Sen and CPP will demean the destruction like Sam Rainsy more and
more.
Sam Rainsy and his party are not the love of their country. They put
their power first. That's why they fight for their power. They see Hun
Sen and his government as Vietnamese because they know the people of
Cambodia hate Vietnamese.
Today, the majority of Cambodian know it well that Sam Rainsy rhetoric
is untrue. That's why they voted him out in the last election.
Do you know that it was the best and fail election Cambodians had ever
had since Khmer Rouge?



> What do you think?
>
> KY
>
> --
> Cambodian Brighter Future depends on enduring conscience and tireless
> strivings of Cambodian Younger 
> Generation!http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to