Well said. W
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Len Graceffo <[email protected]>wrote: > The UN has long been a corrupt genocidal institution doing business with > anyone as long as they can collectively or even unilaterly rape developing > countries of their natural resources. Dr. Beat Richner of the Bopha Angkor > hospital in Siem Reap has a long running lawsuit against the UN for what he > calls"The Silent Genocide". Foreign NGO's creating the illusion of helping > Cambodia by giving children medicine that doesn't work and kills them > faster. Not providing proper or any diagnosis. Having a coloniolist > mentality by having Princess Anne saying that western medicine is too > expensive for Cambodian children(but not too expensive for her own free > loading white family).Because 80% of the money goes to administration. > They're in business for themselves the corrupt bastards. The U.S. has for > example been trying to undermine and povertize Canada through punitive trade > policies beit softwood lumber or beef for years. It has also been trying to > get Canada to abandon medicare. Anyone who wants to sacrifice his neighbors > healthcare in order to line his own pocket with gold is guilty of treason > and unpatriotic !!!Why? Because corrupt wealthy Anglo Saxons, French > Catholics and wealthy jews have shaped Canada's foreign policy ie "The North > American Free Trade Agreement" to undermine working Canadians' Soverignty > and line their pockets with gold !!! Canada is now having problems with > human trafficking and chid abduction is said to be heading our way. There > will be politicians in Canada willing to look the other way as long as those > children are indigenous Indians and not white. Really!!! > The UN must think it's cheaper to pay off corrupt governments than to > initiate change because they don't care!!! As long as there are people in > power who are allowed to be there this will continue. I predict that the > west will eventually collectively gang up on Burma, Vietnam, Laos and > Cambodia to hold China at bay as this recent economic crisis has given China > too much leverage. Regards, Lenny G > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: A One-eyed Bastard Thanks You for Your Donation > Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:16:53 -0500 > > A One-eyed Bastard Thanks You for Your > Donation<http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2009/03/one-eyed-bastard-thanks-you-for-your.html> > > <http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_76xUgRgjZYM/Sa8fWJn0vII/AAAAAAAAKtM/aDFYxks6clM/s1600-h/Hun+Sen+laughing.jpg>Hun > Sen, described by Singaporean strongman Lee Kwan Yew as “utterly merciless > and ruthless, without humane feelings” > > > <http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_76xUgRgjZYM/Sa8eSoDYGUI/AAAAAAAAKtE/DK2P8bngb9c/s1600-h/Philip+Duck.jpg>Thursday, > 5 March 2009 > Philip Duck > Opinion: SOLO - Sense of Life Objectivists > SOLO-NZ Op-Ed: A One-eyed Demonic Bastard Thanks You for Your Donation > > Between one-third and one-half of Cambodians live in crushing poverty as > they try to survive on a dollar or less a day. That poverty motivates many > poor peasant families to sell their young daughters into brothels; one-third > of Cambodia’s prostitutes are under the age of seventeen and sentenced to a > life of being caged in a grubby shack to service grubby men, for nothing > more than a bowl of rice each day. > > Poverty results in one half of Cambodian children under the age of five > being underweight, and infant mortality stands at 95 deaths per 1000. More > than half of those deaths are due to diseases and infections that can easily > be prevented by vaccines. The percentage of its population living with > HIV/Aids is the highest in Asia and it has been estimated that more that 7 > million Cambodians- that’s 64% of the population- carry tuberculosis. > Poverty means an average life expectancy for a Cambodian is just 56 years. > > NZAID, the New Zealand Government’s international aid and development > agency, has allocated 4.4 million dollars to Cambodia as it attempts to > address this suffocating poverty. And who could argue against that- a dollar > each from comparatively wealthy New Zealanders to assist the desperately > poor. But of course this is not the government’s money to give away; in true > Robin Hood style the government steals from the taxpayer to give, without > consent, to deprived Cambodians. The government with supreme arrogance gets > to declare those who most deserve your money. > > That’s despicable, but what if those tax dollars don’t actually help the > poor but rather they prop up both an untouchable Cambodian elite and an evil > government led by a ruthless killer? What if your money doesn't provide > vaccinations for young Cambodians but instead is used to bribe policeman to > turn a blind-eye to men having sex with children? How would you feel about > your money contributing to that? > > Bauk, or gang rape, is almost a sport to wealthy young Cambodian men. These > spoilt cowards carry out their deeds with impunity; money, influence and > corruption ensure that they will not come to trial.The favourite method for > rich wives to take revenge on their husband’s mistresses is to throw a > bucket of acid in their rivals face; however political and business power > ensure that justice will never be served. And should you have a disagreement > in a nightclub with one of Cambodia’s moneyed he might just shoot you. Or > more likely he will get one of his bodyguards to do it. Either way for them > it’s all risk free. Meanwhile corrupt government officials and developers > regularly throw the poor and powerless off their land whilst the police beat > them should they resist. And it’s your money that pays for some of that > unearned power and the bribes and intimidation, it really is. > > Corruption and intimidation have long been a problem in Cambodia and while > there have been campaigns by the UN and nations such as New Zealand to make > any supply of aid dollars contingent on improvements in basic human rights > and the rule-of-law, these have largely failed; the Cambodian government > whilst making the right noises, politely gives the finger to its donors and > continues as it wishes. Why wouldn’t they, when your money keeps on coming > in? > > That money makes up more than 50% of Cambodia’s budget but incredibly it is > estimated that corrupt practices cost the Cambodian people 500 million > dollars every year. That’s hundreds of millions of dollars of foreign aid > drained off to support a truly wicked government and their cohorts and used > to bully the poor, imprison opponents, censor the media and steal land as > and when they please in an environment where corruption is not just > tolerated but encouraged. > > Foreign taxpayers money started coming in 1992 when the UN established the > United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC). Its mandate was > to implement law and order, rebuild the country’s infrastructure and assist > with the re-settlement of tens of thousands of people who had fled the > murderous Khmer Rouge regime. Most importantly UNTAC was there to oversee > free and fair elections. UNTAC bought more than 9,000 vehicles, spent $118 > million on salaries and $62 million on travel and, incredibly, paid a daily > hardship allowance to a large number of senior UN officials of more than the > average annual Cambodian salary. Two billion dollars was spent in all and > they failed. > > The lead up to the 1993 elections was marred by violence and political > intimidation, particularly by the members of the Cambodian People’s Party > (CPP); a party led by Hun Sen. Hun Sen had for some years been the Prime > Minister of Cambodia having being installed by the Vietnamese as a puppet > and this allowed him to make full use of his already established powers over > the police and army. Bizarrely, despite the attacks but most likely > because of the immense amount of dollars poured into Cambodia, the UN > declared the election to be ‘free and fair.' Nevertheless, regardless of all > CPP attempts it was the Royalist party, FUNCINPEC, headed by Prince > Ranariddh that headed the election with 45% of the vote against the 36% > achieved by the CPP. > > However, Hun Sen refused to accept this loss and with heavy threats backed > by both military and police force and a few well-aimed grenades he destroyed > the new democratic process by forcing a coalition with an unwilling > FUNCINPEC. Incredibly this arrangement meant Cambodia was to have two Prime > Ministers, with Ranariddh being Prime Minister Number One and Hun Sen, Prime > Minister Number Two. Prime Ministers One and Two quickly increased M.P > salaries ten-fold. And after spending $2 billion dollars of other people's > money the UN sat back and allowed all this to happen and in the process > showed Hun Sen that he could do just as he pleased. Meanwhile government and > UN money kept on rolling in. > > In 1997 Hun Sen, described by Singaporean strongman Lee Kwan Yew as > “utterly merciless and ruthless, without humane feelings,” carried out a > bloody coup that removed FUNCIPEC from power. Hun Sen, an ex-military > commander of the Khmer Rouge was now firmly in control and a series of ‘free > and fair’ elections have sinced increased his parliamentary majority. That > majority is surely nonsense; since 2000 I have made 8 or 9 visits to > Cambodia and I have yet to find one Cambodian supporter of Hun Sen. Not one. > What you can find though is fear, hatred and rage for that one-eyed demonic > bastard. Yet your money keeps on rolling in. > > Following the coup, to further secure his power, Hun Sen shaped 180 new > ministerial positions, most of which he proceeded to sell for $100,000 a > pop. It’s often claimed that Hun Sen leads the biggest per capita government > in the world and it is certainly one of the most corrupt. Yet donor money > keeps on rolling in. It keeps on rolling in despite a 2003 UN development > report that found that poverty has become much worse under Hun Sen and that > the rate of infant mortality rose between 1987 and 2000; not that such > matters as infant mortality, tuberculosis or grinding poverty would be of > any concern to a man like Hun Sen. And the money keeps on rolling in despite > Hun Sen’s public support for the barbarians of the Burmese junta and it > keeps on rolling in despite Cambodia’s development as a breeding ground > for terrorists. Ultimately your taxed dollars, funnelled through to > Cambodia by the UN and government funds these outrages. How do you feel > about that? > > If well-targeted 4.4 million dollars could achieve many, many positive > things in Cambodia. But certainly government has no right to take your money > and then decide to use it in its own way, let alone in a way that helps > fund Hun Sen and his cronies. Rather, the business of donating is best > left to individuals or private companies who can research and scrutinise, > should they wish, the many private charities in Cambodia to see where best > their money could be used. Hell, they couldn’t do worse at that than NZAID > who are also in the process of spending more than 13 million dollars on the > one-party states of Laos and Vietnam. > > SOLO (Sense of Life Objectivists): SOLOPassion.com<http://solopassion.com/> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
