For Immediate Release
Cambodia: 1997 Grenade Attack on Opposition Still Unpunished
Suspects in Attack Have Been Promoted Instead of Prosecuted
( New York , March 30, 2009) – Twelve years after a grenade attack on an
opposition party rally that killed at least 16 people and wounded more than
100, the Cambodian government has still taken no steps to bring the
perpetrators to justice, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch
criticized the recent promotions of officials suspected of involvement in that
attack.
On March 30, 1997, about 200 supporters of the opposition politician Sam Rainsy
gathered in a park across the street from the National Assembly in Phnom Penh
to denounce the judiciary’s lack of independence and judicial corruption. In a
well-planned attack, four grenades were thrown into the crowd, killing
protesters and bystanders, including children, and blowing limbs off street
vendors. An FBI investigation concluded that Cambodian government officials
were responsible for the attack.
“The attack on Sam Rainsy and his supporters remains an open wound in Cambodia
, but neither the government nor Cambodia ’s donors are doing anything to hold
those responsible to account,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights
Watch. “The perpetual failure to address this crime has made March 30 ‘Impunity
Day’ in Cambodia . This anniversary, on the day the Khmer Rouge trials are
beginning, shows how far Cambodia has to go toward holding human rights abusers
accountable.”
On the day of the grenade attack, Prime Minister Hun Sen’s personal bodyguard
unit, Brigade 70, was, for the first time, deployed at a demonstration. The
elite military unit, in full riot gear, not only failed to prevent the attack,
but was seen by numerous witnesses opening up its lines to allow the
grenade-throwers to escape and threatening to shoot people trying to pursuing
the attackers.
Rather than punishing the people who ordered and carried out the grenade
attack, the government has handed out high-level promotions to several known
human rights abusers in Cambodia ’s armed forces and national police –
including at least two linked to the 1997 attack.
The commander of Brigade 70 at the time, Huy Piseth, who ordered the deployment
of Brigade 70 forces to the scene that day, is now undersecretary of state at
the Ministry of Defense. Hing Bunheang, who was deputy commander of Brigade 70
at the time and who threatened to kill journalists investigating the case, was
promoted to deputy military commander of the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces
(RCAF) in January 2009.
“Handing out promotions to people implicated in massacring peaceful
demonstrators is a slap in the face for the victims,” said Adams . “This seems
to be an intentional message from Hun Sen – that those who do his bidding will
be promoted, no matter how egregious their acts.”
Other RCAF officials promoted in January to deputy commander face serious
allegations of human rights abuses. They include Military Intelligence Chief
Mol Roeup and Military Police Commander Sao Sokha. Like the commanders of
Brigade 70, these men are close confidants of Hun Sen who have been implicated
in abductions, torture, and extrajudicial killings.
The failure to pursue those responsible for the 1997 attack is part of a
widespread pattern of well-connected perpetrators evading justice. Some
examples include:
* On September 4, 2008, Mean Sokchea, a RCAF major working in Brigade 70,
shot dead 21-year-old waitress Put Samphors at a restaurant in Kandal province.
Mean Sokchea, in a drunken stupor, fired his gun and apparently mistakenly hit
Put Samphors in the stomach. She was taken to a hospital but later died of her
wounds. Mean Sokchea was detained by the police overnight but was then
released, allegedly after intervention by Hing Bun Heang. Put Samphor’s family
received US$2,700 from Mean Sokchea, and the police told them that their
daughter was shot while authorities were chasing robbers.
* On the night of January 16, 2003, a street youth named Prak Sitha was
beaten to death at the Ministry of Interior (MOI) headquarters after he was
arrested and detained by off-duty MOI officers on suspicion of theft. His body
– bearing numerous injuries to the head, torso, arms, and legs – was dumped at
a Phnom Penh pagoda the following morning by ministry officers, in violation of
police regulations regarding deaths in custody. No criminal charges were filed
in connection with this death. In December 2004, the case was cited by the UN
secretary-general’s special representative for human rights in Cambodia – who
stated that Prak Sitha died at the ministry “following beatings by a known
police officer” – as an example of a “consistent and continuing pattern of
impunity” in Cambodia .
* On December 5, 1999, Tat Marina, age 16, was severely disfigured in an
acid attack in Phnom Penh . The attack was allegedly committed by Khun Sophal,
the wife of a senior government official, Svay Sitha, because she was angry her
husband had a sexual relationship with Tat Marina. Neither Khun Sophal nor
those suspected of being her accomplices in the attack were brought to justice.
Intense media publicity compelled the Phnom Penh Municipal Court to issue an
arrest warrant for Khun Sophal for attempted murder, but the police claimed
that they could not locate her, although journalists reported that she was
living at home as usual.
While the Cambodian police and courts regularly allow well-connected or
financially able criminal suspects to escape prosecution, the justice system is
also routinely used by the government to lock up its political opponents who
have committed no crimes. For example, on March 20, 2009, Tuot Saron – former
Sam Rainsy Party commune chief in Kompong Thom – was convicted on charges of
kidnapping and illegal confinement, although no credible evidence was put
forward by the prosecution
(http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2008/03/22/cambodia-opposition-officials-arrested-sway-elections).
On February 19, the Appeal Court upheld the murder conviction of Thach Saveth,
who is serving a 15-year prison sentence for the 2004 murder of a trade union
official, Ros Sovannareth, despite the government’s failure to produce any
credible evidence against Thach Saveth.
Human Rights Watch said that the Cambodian judiciary’s lack of independence
will impact its ability to provide fair and impartial justice in the trials of
former Khmer Rouge leaders, being carried out with a mix of Cambodian and
international judges.
“The political control of Cambodia ’s courts is the main reason so many
Cambodians and observers are concerned that the trials of Khmer Rouge leaders
will lack credibility,” said Adams . “In this way, Cambodia ’s tragic history
and troubled present are deeply connected.”
For more information, please contact:
In Phnom Penh , Sara Colm : +855-12-804-755 (mobile)
In London , Brad Adams : +44-20-7713-2767; or +44-790-872-8333 (mobile)
In Washington , DC , Sophie Richardson : +1-202-612-4341; or +1-917-721-7473
(mobile)
"My Khmer Compatriots, ask not what Cambodia and her People can do for you, ask
what you can do for Cambodia and her People"
The Khmer Politicians have only interpreted the Cambodia and her beloved people
in various ways.
The point, however, is to change it...
---Khmer Blood---
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
