Sunday, June 7, 2009 Om Yintieng's Strategy in Handling with all Critical Issues in Cambodia<http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/2009/06/om-yintiengs-strategy-in-handling-with.html>
Om Yintieng has used the same strategy to respond to all critical public expression and criticism by using the tactis of "to arbitrarily oppose them or push them to the corner". For instance, in case of UN's human rights commission Peter Lebridge, Yas Ghai, Global Witness, and present Ambassador Carol Rodly etc. Why Om Yintieng has used this strategy? 1. To intimidate and silence the Cambodian people, 2. To corner them in order to shut the mouth of those critics. *Om Yengtieng on Corruption Denial<http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9iiu2_om-yengtieng-on-corruption-denial_news> * *Uploaded by khmermediawatch <http://www.dailymotion.com/khmermediawatch>. - News videos from around the world.<http://www.dailymotion.com/us/channel/news> * Just look at the external protocol, we know that Om Yintieng's strategy is to manipulate and divert the attention of Cambodian people as much as he can: 1. He is using National Television Network to persuade the Cambodian public. We don't know how many times this TVK has aired his speech, but his first intention is to give lesson to all Cambodian people with his personal logic to divert the real intention and the real issue of corruption. He justified many things involving corruption such as using his survey statistics (but in our mind want to know how many people he asked questions? How is his survey procedures etc? Why he didn't elaborate it). He used his speech to buy the mind of Cambodian farmers that corruption cannot instabilize the country or it is not the priority for Cambodia's current problems or curruption is not the serious thing for Cambodia. He accepted to resign from his post if he cannot achieve to pass the corruption laws, but it is clearly showing his unwillingness. 2. Everyone has been aware that corruption is underminding all problems in Cambodia: socio, political and economical problems. But Mr. Om Yintieng intentionally articulated his own rationalization by linking to the opinion of Cambodian people that corruption will solely help finding justice in legal system as well as court procedures in Cambodia. Your homework from now is to find out that where is Om Yintieng coming from? To whom his family clan is? Who are those two accompanians? Also, seek the reality that many important grassroots policemen and police posts have been employing former Vietnamese troops or Cambodians? 3. He also spoke on behalf of poor payment to teachers and public servants that the accusation to them about poor salary will conduct more corrupted can not be acceptable. He justified his righteousness to stay close with those poor and low classes ranking public servants. But in reality, everyone has clearly known that incumbent Cambodian government has treated those lower public servants poorly. Their salary cannot afford a decent living. Their hope is waiting the day that government will increase their salary. But at the present they have to try their best for their stomach and family. The morality and ethics of those public servants have been deteriorated by Om Yintieng's government. Those lower public servants are the victime of those powerful and Om Yintieng's vanguard. 4. Critically, the two men accompanied Om Yintieng in this TVK alienably look non-Khmer personality. This also include Om Yintieng himself. <http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_jVCbxaOxjhA/SixMywSGMlI/AAAAAAAAASM/JpkPalfl1Kg/s1600-h/OmYintieng.jpg>Your homework from now is to find out that where is Om Yintieng coming from? To whom his family clan is? Who are those two accompanians? Also, seek the reality that many important grassroots policemen and police posts have been employing former Vietnamese troops or Cambodians? The truth of Real Estate Business exspanding of Uncle Ho in Cambodia and Lao is critical to those Khmer and Laos descendants. 5. Om Yintieng has used the same strategy to respond to all critical public expression and criticism by using the tactis of "to arbitrarily oppose them or push them to the corner". For instance, in case of UN's human rights commission Peter Lebridge, Yas Ghai, Global Witness, and present Ambassador Carol Rodly etc. Why Om Yintieng has used this strategy? 1. To intimidate and silence the Cambodian people, 2. To corner them in order to shut the mouth of those critics. Cambodia is going to be better off or worse off under this nature of leadership of Om Yintieng and Sok Ann? KY -- Cambodian Brighter Future depends on enduring conscience and tireless strivings of Cambodian Younger Generation! http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
