One needs to understand Khmer mentality.

MP Mu sued PM Hun to prove the point that PM is a “gangster”.
PM countersued MP to prove that he is a “gangster”.
Both MP and PM are successfully proved the point.

On Sep 18, 7:13 pm, Jayakhmer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also posted atwww.modernprogressivekhmer.blogspot.com
> By Jayakhmer
>
> The dispute between our elected officials namely between the most
> powerful man in Cambodia and a helpless member of parliamentarian
> takes on new twists and turns.  The battle is being fought
> internationally.  Mu Sochua has been attracting a lot of international
> attentions especially from the US Congress.  This proves yet again
> that Samdech Prime Minister Hun Sen and his advisors have
> miscalculated the impact.
>
> In the afternoon of September 14th, I attended the meeting at
> Berkeley.  The Goldberg Room at Boalt Hall Law School where Mu Sochua
> gave a talk was a small room and was packed with about less than 200
> people. All the seats were taken; I stood against the wall listening
> to a courageous woman telling her struggles in her motherland to a
> friendly and sympathetic audience.
>
> “I will not compromise,” Mu Sochua repeated several times as she
> described the human rights situation in Cambodia.
>
> Listening to Mu Sochua, I could not help but wonder how we came to
> this point politically.
>
> I certainly understand her position as an elected Cambodian woman
> fighting against the most powerful man in the country with the
> circumstance within which her parliamentary immunity was stripped; her
> lawyer was threatened to be disbarred and consequently withdrew
> himself from the case; and the Phnom Penh Municipal Court rejected her
> lawsuit against the Prime Minister but honored the counter lawsuit by
> the Prime Minister that everyone including herself knew from the start
> she had no chance.
>
> On July 24, 2009, of course, the court rendered a verdict of guilty
> for defaming the Prime Minister and sentenced Mu Sochua to a fine of
> 10 million riels ($2,500).
>
> As I looked around the room full of concerned and interested students
> and scholars, I was a bit embarrassed.  Cambodia is such a small
> country about the size of the state of Missouri with a minuscule
> national budget if we compare to that of California’s and other
> states’ in the union, and yet it manages to have so many problems.
> “Why can’t we get our act together or why can’t we get along,” I
> wonder quietly.
>
> It would be simplistic and a gross generalization to say that “we
> fight each other like dogs and cats.”  There are reasons why we
> fight.  When we fight, each side wants to win.
>
> If any one thinks that Mu Sochua has been a recalcitrant and an
> unweaving politician in this fight, one should equally, if not more,
> blame the Prime Minister for creating this political atmosphere.  The
> Prime Minister should have been advised to say, “I am very sorry.”  As
> strong willed and as determined as Mu Sochua, she would have accepted
> the apology.
>
> The case would have been closed.
>
> Although this is just my conjecture, the Prime Minister should fire
> all of those advisors if he was advised to pursuit this case with Mu
> Sochua or and the case with Professor Yash Ghai, the UN Special Envoy
> on Human Rights in Cambodia in the recent past.  Those advisors or the
> ideas of fighting Mu Sochua and  the special envoy on human rights
> were short-sighted and incompetent for they failed to think through
> some of the most important issues that make Cambodia appears to be
> worst than the bad situation the country is already in.
>
> Why CPP chooses to treat member(s) of the minority party this way is
> beyond me for CPP and its leadership already controls every powerful
> position in the country.  CPP, as a major political party, should be
> magnanimously working with minority parties to truly fine solutions to
> improve the country together. That includes the Human Rights issues.
>
> As long as we have a political system with multiple-party structure,
> it is common and expected to have political fighting.
>
> Political fighting is healthy as long as we remember that winning a
> political opponent by loosing the respect of the world is not worth
> winning.  And winning the respect of the world but loosing oneself in
> the process is also worthless.
>
> A true patriot respects and even loves his/her political opponent.
> After all we are members of the same human race of small nation that
> barely can sustain itself without the outside’s supports. Our dignity
> as a human race and as a nation lays on the question of how well we
> can build each other up and not on how effectively we can destroy each
> other.
>
> Political common sense requires that a politician always gives his/her
> opponent a way out with dignity.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to