Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:12:20 -0700
Subject: Brad Pitt in adult movies???
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
READ THIS MESS IN THE US FOREIGN POLICY .
Obama's Foreign Policy is a Mess
September 21, 2009
RUSH: Finally on this foreign policy business, and we've had this before,
Madeleine Albright has said before that it's not good for the US to be the only
superpower that has the world out of kilter, not in proper balance. September
18th article in Pravda, Pravda in Russia, reporting on comments Albright made
during the Young Entrepreneurs International Business forum September 13th
through the 17th, organized by the Ministry of Sport, Youth Policy, and Tourism
of the Russian Federation. And here's the headline: "'Madeleine Albright: USA
No Longer Intends To Be World's No.1 State.' -- Madeleine Albright said during
the meeting that America no longer had the intention of being the first nation
of the world." And here's an Albright quote from 1998: "We very much don't
want to be out there by ourselves as the organizer and the only superpower.
People don't believe that. They think we just want to be King of the Hill, but
we do not."
Now, folks, knocking down the United States from its position of number one has
been a left-wing project for generations. It is an explicit Democrat governing
policy whenever they're in office. They hate a powerful America.
THE FACTS ARE :
UN Passes Strong Resolution on Cambodia Human Rights Abuses
Feb. 27, 1982 : UN Commission on Human Rights meeting in Geneva adopted a
resolution condemning Vietnam’s occupation of Cambodia as a violation of
Cambodian human rights. The vote was 28 in favor, 8 against, and 5 abstentions.
Oct. 21, 1986 The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution A/RES/41/6, by vote
of 116-21 with 13 abstentions, calling for a withdrawal of Vietnamese forces
from Cambodia.
this woman , the Deputy Prime Ministers Men Sam An(A VIETNAMESE ), Nhek Bun
Chhay and Keat Chhon.
Ms Chea Leang seen here on this picture ,the so called "CAMBODIAN"
CO-PROSECUTOR, is a Vietnamese woman
Phnom Penh (Cambodia) 20 November 2006. Co-prosecutors Robert Petit talked to
Chea Leang(a Vietnamese posing as "Cambodian" co-prosecutor) during the plenary
session of judges for the KR Tribunal (Photo: John Vink/Magnum)
Tribunal Prosecutors Differ on Added Suspects
Chea Leang(a Vietnamese )posing as "Cambodian" co-prosecutor)Tribunal judges
will determine whether more suspects should be investigated.
WHAT RIGHTS DO THESE VIETNAMESE INVADERS HAVE TO CONTINUE TO
REMAIN IN THE COUNTRY AS MASTERS OF THE LAND?
Bury
Folks, "Ah, let's get out of Afghanistan, too. We can't win. Let's focus on
Iran." Well, what the hell? The latest on Iran is that Zbigniew Brzezinski is
advising the US military to shoot down Israeli jets if they launch an attack.
We actually have Americans advising Americans to shoot down Israeli jets, that
that would be in the best interests for Obama, the best interests for America.
We can't win in Iraq. You can't fight wars this way. You cannot set national
policy this way.
RUSH: Let's go to foreign policy now. This is dangerous. I have a series of
stories here, we're forgetting our own security. We're not even farming it
out. We're just not even going to pay any attention to it. "'Barack Obama
Ready to Slash US Nuclear Arsenal.' -- Pentagon told to map out radical cuts as
president prepares to chair UN talks. Barack Obama has demanded the Pentagon
conduct a radical review of US nuclear weapons doctrine to prepare the way for
deep cuts in the country's arsenal, the Guardian can reveal. Obama has rejected
the Pentagon's first draft of the 'nuclear posture review' as being too timid."
This may be the most dangerous development yet, and I hope he fails. Who in
their right mind doesn't hope this dangerous president fails?
Washington Post today: "'Changes Have Obama Rethinking War Strategy.' --
Although Obama endorsed a strategy document in March that called for "executing
and resourcing an integrated civilian-military counterinsurgency strategy,"
there have been significant changes in Afghanistan and Washington since then."
You know, keep in mind Obama owns this now. This is his general; this is his
strategy, a strategy change in March. He's now still reviewing his options and
asking, "Are we doing the right thing?" First question, are we doing the right
thing, are we pursuing the right strategy? That's what he said on his Sunday
appearance on CNN. Then, "Obama's pick for Afghanistan commander warns of
rising casualties, a stiff fight ahead and asks for more troops." A couple of
articles I have here with excerpts from a few months ago about McChrystal's
confirmation. Obama chose McChrystal, the general, Obama chose him. Obama
chose to ramp up the fight in Afghanistan and now he's choosing to play
politics instead of behaving as a responsible commander-in-chief.
Now, the general hasn't changed, McChrystal hasn't changed, it's Obama who's
changed. If Obama doesn't want to win the war in Afghanistan, it wouldn't come
as a surprise because he has said as much. He doesn't like the word victory.
It conjures up embarrassing images of the Japanese surrender in World War II
aboard the USS Missouri. Now, if he doesn't want to win the war in
Afghanistan, no surprise, look what he's done to the deficit. Look what he's
done to the national debt. Look what he's done to jobs. Look what he's done
to the private sector. GM, Chrysler, insurance companies, doctors and so on.
You know, fighting wars are hard things to do. Playing politics, why, that's
easy, comes natural to the community-organizer-in-chief. Playing politics,
putting off urgent pleas for additional troops from the general you chose to
lead the war effort in Afghanistan because you don't want to lose your
left-wing kook base and that's what largely this is all about, Obama can't
afford to lose his left-wing kook base. He needs them to get them out there
marching. The NEA calls, he needs these people all trumped up and hyped up to
pass his health care legislation, and he's going to lose them if he ramps up
the war in Afghanistan, he's going to lose even some radicals in the House and
the Senate.
And then back July 14th: "Obama Purges Website Critique of Surge in Iraq."
Remember, now, the best military leaders told us the surge in Iraq could win
the war there and they were right. What did Senator Obama say about the surge?
He said the surge in Iraq would fail, and after it succeeded he said it
failed. And despite that gross misjudgment Obama was given a promotion, made
commander-in-chief. Now, today we have issues in Afghanistan that require the
best judgment of our best military leaders. They say more troops are needed
immediately if we're to win in Afghanistan as we did in Iraq. And, by the way,
Afghanistan's not just Afghanistan, the Taliban's all over the place. They're
in Pakistan, too. If we pull out of there, which is what it looks like Obama's
prepared to do to hold onto his fringe base, if we pull out of there, then
Afghanistan goes back to being a terrorist state. We'll eventually have to go
back at some point when there's somebody responsible running the country. I
have to say this, it makes me sad to say it, but there's even a growing
popularity among the elites, and not just the leftist elites, by the way, some
even on our side are suggesting, "Yeah, you know what? Why don't we just get
out of there? Why, we can't win there, wasting treasure, why, just get out of
there."
Folks, if we do that all to appease his fringe base, it's going to be a
disaster. What is needed is an all-out effort to destroy the Taliban in
Afghanistan and along the border with Pakistan, heavy bombers included, and an
all-out effort to build up Afghan military and police force with serious
resources. How often did we hear all during the campaign, all during the last
three years of the Iraq war, the last four years, how often did we hear that
Afghanistan is the place we ought to be, not Iraq, Afghanistan is where Osama
is. We haven't captured Osama. We gotta go to Afghanistan, we gotta win
there, just get out of Iraq, we need to reallocate our resources to
Afghanistan. So we gradually pull out of Iraq. And now all of a sudden we're
hearing, "Ah, let's get out of Afghanistan, too. We can't win. Let's focus on
Iran." Well, what the hell? The latest on Iran is that Zbigniew Brzezinski is
advising the US military to shoot down Israeli jets if they launch an attack.
We actually have Americans advising Americans to shoot down Israeli jets, that
that would be in the best interests for Obama, the best interests for America.
We can't win in Iraq. You can't fight wars this way. You cannot set national
policy this way.
If we leave Afghanistan we create a terrorist nation. It's right on the border
with Pakistan and may topple that government, then what happens to India?
They're not going to sit around and let this happen. You know, they've nuked
up. They're not going to sit around and just let all this overrun them. But
these liberal elites: "Oh, man we gotta get into Afghanistan, we gotta really
go there, we gotta get Osama, we gotta get out of Iraq." And then they take us
to war, and then they can't wait to declare defeat. They take us to war and
the last thing they want to do is win. Some phony conservatives are at this,
too, becoming more and more populist rather than principled: "We need to get
out of there."
So where do we take a stand? We're not going to take a stand in Iraq under
this guy. We're not going to take a stand in Afghanistan, apparently. We're
not going to make a stand in Iran, not Poland, not Czech Republic, not Latin
America. Where are we going to take a stand? We're under assault everywhere.
We're siding with our enemies. Where are we going to take a stand? We're not
going to take a stand, you know why? We are willingly relinquishing our
superpower status. Yeah, that's old-fashioned. It's unproductive to global
cooperation, because we need to cooperate globally on the climate, on the swine
flu, on bank regulations, and executive compensation. And that's what the
agenda of this administration.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Finally on this foreign policy business, and we've had this before,
Madeleine Albright has said before that it's not good for the US to be the only
superpower that has the world out of kilter, not in proper balance. September
18th article in Pravda, Pravda in Russia, reporting on comments Albright made
during the Young Entrepreneurs International Business forum September 13th
through the 17th, organized by the Ministry of Sport, Youth Policy, and Tourism
of the Russian Federation. And here's the headline: "'Madeleine Albright: USA
No Longer Intends To Be World's No.1 State.' -- Madeleine Albright said during
the meeting that America no longer had the intention of being the first nation
of the world." And here's an Albright quote from 1998: "We very much don't
want to be out there by ourselves as the organizer and the only superpower.
People don't believe that. They think we just want to be King of the Hill, but
we do not."
Now, folks, knocking down the United States from its position of number one has
been a left-wing project for generations. It is an explicit Democrat governing
policy whenever they're in office. They hate a powerful America. They do
whatever they can to weaken us by any means necessary. We are the problem in
the world, from global warming to executive compensation, to banking and
financial regulations. And make no mistake, this is who they are. They don't
like us being supreme. We're immoral and we are unjust, and this is something
Obama believes as well. I think this totally explains the ideology behind what
Obama is doing internationally and domestically, for that matter. It's all
purposeful. All of this is purposeful. So Madeleine Albright in Pravda, in
Russia, with a reminder of how the mission of Democrats in power is always to
weaken -- this makes me sick. This makes me sick.
I was at the Redskins game yesterday and I ran into four of the most handsome,
young, clean cut Marines. They were just ready to get their orders, and
they're heading to Afghanistan, some were heading to Camp Lejeune, and these
people all volunteered to defend and protect their country and this
Constitution. They're some of the greatest young men. They're 23 to 24 years
old, and they were up there as guests of Coach Zorn in his suite for the
Rams-Redskins game. They got me on the phone to one of their buddies who was
in Twentynine Palms, California, who was being sent to a hellhole in southern
Afghanistan, and here we have the commander-in-chief and his administration
doing what they can to knock us off the perch that these guys have signed up,
volunteered, and trained for to defend. It's sickening.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Eric in Tucson, Arizona, I'm glad you waited. You're up first today,
sir. Great to have you here with us.
CALLER: Thank you. Two quick points. One, you touched on that, is that Obama
told us during the campaign that he had the plan, it was more troops and now
he's saying he doesn't know, and I'll tell you, it's a little late for that.
Number two, he gave away on the stand-down on our defense system, he gave away
all his leverage before he even got to the table, got nothing in return. He
does this all the time. It shows somebody who doesn't know how to negotiate
because they've never been in a business setting where you have to cut a deal.
Our biggest chip is gone now, the defense. The Russians gave nothing to us.
That's scary. And, I'll tell you what, it's also scary that the
commander-in-chief can't get a top secret memo from his commander in
Afghanistan to the president without it getting leaked, that's scary.
RUSH: I think you're looking at this from the wrong perspective and the wrong
context. I'm going to be blunt with you. See, you are expressing the outrage
of anybody who would look at the contents, the context, and the substance of
what Obama is saying, and you're doing so on the basis of the benefit of the
doubt that he actually wants to win in Afghanistan. He doesn't. That he
actually wants to do something about the Iranian nuclear program. He doesn't.
He does want to make nice with the Russians. He wants to make nice with
Chavez. Remember, the enemies of America are friends of Obama's. Anybody who
thinks this country has been wrong, immoral, unjust, imperialistic, a
superpower, they're right! So this business of owning Afghanistan, sending
more troops, that's a campaign thing. BS. That's something to try to grab
some people for his domestic agenda from the right. "Oh, wow, Obama is doing
the right thing, he's doing the right thing in Afghanistan." We heard 'em say
all during the campaign, we're in the wrong place, Iraq's the wrong place,
gotta go to Afghanistan, gotta get Osama. He didn't care about any of that.
The leak, who do you think leaked it? Who do you think leaked the request for
troops? And why do you think Obama is putting more stock in the desires of his
fringe base than the commander he appointed? All that matters to him is his
domestic agenda and he's gonna do whatever he has to do to get that. This
Afghanistan business, it's really sad but it's not just Afghanistan. You've
got, as I pointed out, Madeleine Albright running around I'm sure echoing this
administrations sentiments when she says that we don't want to be the
superpower anymore, it's not productive, it doesn't provide balance in the
world, we don't want to be the big guy anymore. And he's seeing to it that
we're not going to be. In the meantime what's at risk is our own security.
CALLER: I mean I think he's putting our troops at risk, too, by --
RUSH: Yeah, of course.
CALLER: -- a morale issue of the enemy that's giving the enemy the impression
that we possibly are going to lose and we need to do this and that's the next
step we need to take.
RUSH: This is one thing I can't get into Obama's head on. I can't get my arms
around the fact that we might have president who wants us to become dominated
by all these foreign policies that don't like us. I may be naïve, it may be
just who he is, but I can't get my arms around that, but I don't know how to
conclude anything else. We're going to slash the nuclear arsenal all to hell.
Nobody else is going to have to do all that. There's no agreement where they
get rid of some, we get rid of some. We're just going to do it. We pull down
the missile shield protecting Poland and the Czech Republic, and we do it on
the 70% anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland. That's no coincidence.
And now we've got administration officials saying, "Look, if the Israelis want
to run an attack on Iran and their nuclear arsenal over there they've gotta fly
over Iraq, and they've got to ask us for permission to fly over Iraqi airspace,
we run the show. And if they don't ask us, if they just fly over, what do we
do?" This is the question they're debating in the administration, "What do we
do?"
And Zbigniew Brzezinski, the national security advisor for Carter, saying,
(paraphrasing) "We need to shoot down the Israeli jets. We cannot allow an
attack on Iran from Israel. That would be the worst thing that could happen to
us. We can't allow that to happen. We gotta go up there, we gotta engage
them. We gotta send our jets up and we gotta try to convince the Israeli jets
to turn around if this all happens. If they don't, we gotta be prepared to
shoot 'em down." The actual advisor to Jimmy Carter suggesting that this is
what we do. Now, you take all this, the commander in Afghanistan says he needs
more troops, Obama said, (paraphrasing) "I'm not going to send more troops 'til
we come up with the right strategy." Well, hell, the strategery is yours
already, it's the so-called surge. We're going into the Pakistan-Afghanistan
border, we're going to root out the Taliban, I thought we had the strategy?
Oh, no, apparently not working if the commander needs more troops. Well, we're
not going to send more troops. The only reason we're not going to send more
troops is he doesn't want to make John Kerry mad, he doesn't want to make
Pelosi mad and he doesn't want to make the fringe kooks on the blogs mad. He
needs them for his domestic agenda. Pure and simple.
You know, and dangling over there unprotected now is US national security. And
all these wacko Carterite Democrats running around saying, "We can't let
anybody attack Iran, why, that would be the worst thing that could happen to
us." Folks, I don't know how to interpret it 'cause I haven't gotten to the
point yet that we've elected a president who actually wants us to lose major
conflicts, that wants our national security to be compromised and nonexistent.
(interruption) I know Democrats will not allow a loss on their watch. That's
in Iraq, I said. I did say Iraq. I specified it to Iraq but when you look at
what else they're destroying here, they're destroying the US economy, they're
gobbling up the private sector as fast as they can. It's tough to see it any
other way. You know, it's just like Eric here, by the way, it's not his fault.
Everybody, you take Obama, you look at the specifics, you look at what he says
about the issues, you look at what he's done and you analyze it that way. You
miss the point when you do it that way.
You have to understand the starting point with Obama. He's told us he's
uncomfortable with victory in Afghanistan. I'm not making this up. He's
uncomfortable with victory because it embarrassed him to see pictures of the
Japanese surrendering in World War II as humiliating. If he's not talking
about victory what the hell are we doing, stalemate for the rest of time?
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• UK Guardian: Barack Obama Ready to Slash US Nuclear Arsenal
• Washington Post: Changes Have Obama Rethinking War Strategy
• New York Daily News: Barack Obama Purges Web Site Critique of Surge in Iraq
• Pravda: Madeleine Albright: USA No Longer Intends To Be World's No.1 State
• Sweetness & Light: Brzezinski: Shoot Down Israeli Planes
• American Thinker: Obama cedes Eastern Europe to Putin and A'jad
• Investor's Business Daily: Envisioning A World Without America
• National Review: The Long Retreat. Our Security Will Now Depend on the
Kindness of Strangers - Mark Steyn
> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:12:20 -0700
> Subject: Brad Pitt in adult movies???
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> Here is Brad Pitt with couple cuties... OMG!!!)) http://urlcover.com/brad-pitt
> >
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
