TEA BANH & HUN MANITH VISIT TO US SEC DEF GATES SEEMS TO SAY NOTHING WHILE 
AMERICA IS DOING ABOUT FACE WITH AFGHANISTAN AND POLAND ?

from this columnist

September 23, 2009
FOXNews.com
by KT McFarland 
opinion
Do Gates and 
McChrystal Have the Guts to Fight for Afghanistan?

In the next few days we will learn whether President Obama has the courage to 
do what what is necessary to prevail in Afghanistan. And he does not, will our 
military leaders have the courage to resign in protest?


General McChrystal’s report on the Afghan War should be required reading for 
us all. It’s written in plain English and is brutally realistic in its 
assessment of the current situation. It makes clear that if we continue on the 
path we’re on, even with the additional 21,000 troops President Obama has 
already added, we’re headed for certain defeat.

Put simply, the General concludes that President Obama’s stated goal “to 
disrupt, dismantle and defeat Al Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and to 
prevent their return to either country in the future” cannot be accomplished 
with the current troop levels, resources and military strategy.

Although McChrystal doesn’t ask for more troops in this report, he is 
expected to do so as early as today. He could ask for as many as 40,000 more 
troops, in addition to the 68,000 Obama has already committed to the Afghan 
war. 
While McChrystal warns that additional troops and resources alone will not 
guarantee success, it will at least give him the tools necessary to implement a 
new strategy.

Leaking the McChrystal report to the press, and to the county’s leading 
investigative reporter, Bob Woodward of The Washington Post, was no accident. 
The military has now put the ball firmly in President Obama’s court. The 
McChrystal report leaves no room for ambiguity. If the president is not willing 
to add more troops, commit more resources, and adopt a different military 
strategy, he is going against the advice of his highly regarded, handpicked 
military commander. The inevitable defeat that would follow would be Obama’s to 
own – politically, strategically, militarily.

The question is what does Obama do with the ball now that he’s got it? As 
recently as last month President Obama called Afghanistan a “War of Necessity”, 
in contrast to President Bush’s “War of Choice” in Iraq. He can hardly walk 
away 
from the war now.

But accepting McChrystal’s recommendations and ramping up our war efforts 
will be difficult as well. To do so President Obama faces an uphill battle 
persuading the American people that this war is worth the effort, and 
convincing 
his anti-war political base to go along with it.

If Obama decides to not decide-- in other words to delay or refuse to commit 
the resources McChrysal has called essential-- what will Gen. McChrystal, his 
boss Gen. Petraeus, and Secretary of Defense Gates do? Will they resign in 
protest, or hold their noses and carry out a policy they know is doomed to 
fail?

After the Vietnam war fiasco, many of our junior military officers said 
“never again.” Never again would they stand silently by and fight a war they 
knew would end in disaster. Yet that lesson was forgotten in the aftermath of 
September 11. Once again, our political leaders were unwilling to commit the 
troops or resources needed to bring a quick conclusion to the Iraq and 
Afghanistan wars and once again our senior military leadership went along with 
it. The one military leader who had the courage to call for more troops, Army 
Chief of Staff Eric Shinseki, was fired by Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld for 
saying so. The message was clear.

For now, the battle lines are being drawn in Washington. A fundamental 
principle in our Constitution is civilian control of the military. That means 
our political leaders set the policy and our military leaders recommend to them 
what resources they need to carry them out. If our military leaders disagree, 
they have two options-- carry the orders out in silence, or resign in 
protest.

In the next few days we will learn whether President Obama has the courage to 
do what what is necessary to prevail in Afghanistan. And he does not, will our 
military leaders have the courage to resign in protest?

Kathleen Troia “K.T.” McFarland served in national security posts in the 
Nixon, Ford and Reagan Administrations. She travelled to Afghanistan in May and 
observed firsthand the shortcomings of our Afghan war 
policy.





Email
* not displayed
 Comment Required 

Comment

 

FOX News encourages you to participate 
in this discussion; however, please be sure to review our Terms of Use and 
Privacy 
Statement


 
 
US PRESIDENT RONALD 
REAGAN INSISTS ON CAMBODIA INDEPENDENCE. 1988 





 
 







On April 28, 1984, Deng Xiaoping, Chairman of 
the Advisory Committee of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of 
China, 
meets U.S. President Ronald Reagan in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. 
(Photo: fmprc.gov.cn)
Photo 
Gallery>>>




 

President Reagan's address to the 43d Session of the United Nations 
General Assembly in New York, New York . September 26, 1988. 
"Mr. 
Secretary-General, there are new hopes for Cambodia, a nation whose freedom and 
independence we seek just as avidly as we sought the freedom and independence 
of 
Afghanistan. We urge the rapid removal of all Vietnamese troops 
...."
"Prime Minister Pham Van Dong called on me 
and, in the presence of Premier 
Chou En-lai, swore in the name of the Democratic 
Republic of Vietnam that the latter would always respect the land frontiers as 
well as all islands belonging to the "Kingdom of Cambodia" March 1970 by 
Sihanouk . Wilfred Burchett book "The China Cambodia Vietnam triangle " 
P-176-177
 
UN Passes 
Strong Resolution on Cambodia Human Rights 
Abuses 

Feb. 27, 1982 : UN Commission on Human Rights 
meeting in Geneva adopted a resolution condemning Vietnam’s occupation of 
Cambodia as a violation of Cambodian human rights. The vote was 28 in favor, 8 
against, 
and 5 abstentions.
 
5. Oct. 21, 
1986 The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution A/RES/41/6, by vote of 
116-21 with 13 abstentions, calling for a withdrawal of Vietnamese forces 
from Cambodia.
 
As of 
today,Cambodia is still occupied by the Vietnamese troops despite the call from 
the US president to Vietnam to cease her occupation of Cambodia since 1988. 


Cambodia needs Independence from Vietnam and the Vietnamese 
invaders.
 
Vietnam must cease her occupation of Cambodia at 
once. 

BURY
 

                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage_062009
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to