FYI,

Thanks,

Chanroeun


*The Prince and Preah Vihear*

Published on October 7, 2009

Subhatra Bhumiprabhas

Special to The Nation

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2009/10/07/lifestyle/lifestyle_30114089.php

Nationalism has clouded our view of the temple's ownership, argues one
academic. But history has the simple answer



 On 30 January 1929, Prince Damrong Rajanupab arrived at Preah Vihear as
head of an official expedition from the Siamese court of King Prajadhipok
(Rama VII). There to welcome him was the French commissioner for the
Cambodian province along with the archaeologist Henri Parmentier, who was to
act as guide for the expedition's trip up Panom Dongrek mountain to see its
famed centuries-old Hindu temple.



The prince and the commissioner exchanged speeches of friendship at a
cheerful reception attended by the entourage of high-ranking Siamese
noblemen, before listening to a lecture on Preah Vihear Temple given by the
French archaeologist. Fluttering above this happy scene was the flag of
France.  "This is recorded history - a history that must not be forgotten by
Thai students," said historian Charnvit Kasetsiri, at a talk titled "The
Contested Temple" given recently at the Foreign Correspondents' Club of
Thailand.



 "Prince Damrong accepted that Preah Vihear belonged to French Indochina,"
noted Charnvit, as he showed photographs of the prince and French
commissioner posing together beneath the French flag. But the history that
most Thai students are taught focuses on the loss of territory, he added,
citing a Thai textbook for Grade 6 students.  "It asks us to remember the
loss of territories beginning with Penang and ending with Preah Vihear
Temple. But by ignoring

Prince Damrong's visit in 1929, it effectively tells us to forget about the
truth.  "This is history infected with nationalism."



Charnvit went on to show how the "infection" reaches beyond schoolbooks and
into tourism - a brochure welcoming tourists to Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai
talks about the "Losses of Territories

and Survival of Siam", while Samut Prakan's Muang Boran [Ancient City]
contains a replica of Preah Vihear.



Nationalism and tourism* **go** ***together, he concluded. The current case
of Preah Vihear reflects the kind of "selective history" that stirs
nationalistic feeling and leads to war-mongering threats to take back "lost
territory", he said. Following Prince Damrong's visit, Preah Vihear was left
in

peace for over a decade. Then, in 1940 the government of Field Marshal Plaek
Pibulsongkram added the Hindu temple to its list of Thai archaeological
sites.

 Though the addition was announced in the pages of the Royal Gazette, there
is no evidence that Cambodia's French rulers noticed it. In 1954, the year
after Cambodia won independence,

Pibul sent Thai troops to occupy the area around the Preah Vihear site. But
Thai history tends to ignore this event, preferring to focus on the claim
made by King Sihanouk at the International

Court of Justice in 1959, which in 1962 awarded the temple to Cambodia.
 Charnvit, now 67, recalled how nationalism was working on him the day he
heard of the "loss of territory" brought by the court's judgement.



 "It was a shock because all the news, all the PR from the military
government, told us we were winning for sure," he said.  "We believed that
Preah Vihear belonged to us. I was a 21-year-old student. I was so angry. I
marched with about a hundred Thammasat University students up Rajdamnoen
Avenue. I had a photo of King Sihanouk, which I tore apart, threw down on
the street and trampled."



Finally, Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat, leader of the military government at
the time, made an appearance on television to say the government had no
choice but to accept the ruling of the court. Now, after almost half a
century, the version of history that tells of the "loss" of Preah Vihear has
been brought up to stir nationalism in Thailand once again, with
nationalists saying they refuse to accept the International Court's 1962
judgement. Bad history creates false perceptions and false perceptions lead
to conflict between neighbours, the historian said.

 "Our history texts must be revised and corrected to reflect the truth. Only
that way will we be able to live together peacefully in this age of
regionalism and globalisation."




---
Chanroeun Pa
Ph.D. Scholar

Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (CAPPE)
LPO Box 8260
Australian National University
Canberra ACT 2601
Australia

Mobile: +61 (0)423 633 720
Email: [email protected]
          [email protected]
Skype/ Yahoo: chanroeunkh

+++++++
*Cambodian Translation Link, Inc.
 http://www.ctlink.net
*Cambodian Education Resources Information Centre
 http://cambosastra.org
*Cambodian Centre for Applied Philosophy and Ethics
 http://camcape.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to