Why symbolically?
 
In Cambodian politics, an action like that is called seeking for  a 
political headline or creating an event to throw a political  punch. Nothing 
concrete will come out of such a show. It can get some  people excite 
temporarily. 
What will happen when those posts will be marked  again on the next day? 
Will Raingsy go back there to pull them out  again?  
 
An effective lawmaker, will go though certain legal process to  get things 
done. Why taking the laws into your own hands and  cheapening yourself to 
their level? What's next, will Raingsy "symbolically"  give out ticket for 
traffic infractions, too? Or will he take a gun and chase  after some gangs of 
armed robbery? 
 
=========
 
 
In a message dated 10/26/2009 5:59:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:


It  is possible that symbolically pulling out 6 border posts planted on
the  rice fields belonging to Cambodian villagers might anger the
Vietnamese and  could lead to self destruction. Nobody forces Sam
Rainsy to do it. He does  it on his own free will.

Is it is absurd to suggest that action such  protect your own land from
intruder could lead to the destruction of your  nation.

How can it be?

Worst case, Chau Bury ignores your self  destruction advice, mimics Sam
Rainsy, and goes to pull more border posts.  Good for him (warning: do
it on your own risk).


On Oct 26,  12:04 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> Without collective vision  and leadership, selfish impulsive action could 
 
> lead not only to  self destruction but the destruction of a nation.
>
> Such an  action closes all the roads to future generation.
>
>  =======
>
> In a message dated 10/26/2009 11:35:22 A.M. Eastern  Daylight Time,  
>
> [email protected]  writes:
>
> There are moments when the will of a handful of free  men  breaks
> through determinism and opens up new  roads.
>
> On Oct 26,  9:46 am, [email protected]  wrote:
>
>
>
> > And some time not so long  ago, Sam Rainsy was so  brave to push the  
>  border
> > issue and  then had to run quite fast to France.  Subsequently,  the 
50% +
> 1
> >  formula was  proposed and became laws to placate Hun Sen and to help  
>  secure
> > Hun Sen's everlasting power.
>
> > Maybe  it's  better to fight Hun Sen from his jail.
>
> >  ==========
>
> > In a message dated 10/26/2009 9:06:14  A.M. Eastern  Daylight Time,  
>
> >  [email protected]  writes:
>
> > On  1st  December, 1955, Rosa Parks, a middle-aged  tailor's assistant
>  > from  Montgomery, Alabama, who was tired after  a hard day's  work,
> > refused to give  up her seat to a white  man.
>
> > On Oct 26, 6:49 am,  [email protected]  wrote:
> > As a lawmaker Sam Rainsy should take this  matter up to  the
> > congressional level or to proper  channel. Taking the laws  into his own
> > hand only give Hun  Sen  and the CPP the upper  hand in  Cambodian/
> >  Vietnam court. Border issue is a serious  matter and it must be  dealt
> > with legally.
> > It has to be  resolved, but not via seeking  popularity at a Bonn
> >  Kathen--a  religious function.
>
> > Can  Cambodia  afford to fight two  border  wars?- Hide quoted text  -
>
> - Show quoted text  -



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to