Opinion
____________________________________
GOOD I PRAISE ... DOUBTFUL I RAISE
Kasit misled the nation on MOU with Cambodia
Published on November 23, 2009
MATICHON NEWSPAPER, on November 16, published an article on Dr Kriangsak
Kittichaiseri who was one of the members in the Thai team that negotiated
the drafting of the Memorandum of Understanding between Thailand and Cambodia
on Overlapping Maritime Boundaries.
Both countries claim the areas, which are known to have a sizeable
deposits of oil and natural gas.
The details of the MoU were also published alongside the article. Having
read the article and the MoU, I blamed myself for being so naive and
listening to the words of our Minister of Foreign Affairs on this issue.
My misunderstanding started from the nationalistic emotion as a Thai. The
appointment of Police Lt-Colonel Thaksin Shinawatra, who was sentenced for
wrongdoing in some cases by a Thai court, to be personal adviser to Prime
Minister Hun Sen of Cambodia, was deemed as insulting behaviour by the prime
minister of Cambodia towards Thailand and its justice system.
I felt it was an adequate retaliation to protect the nation's dignity
when, immediately after the appointment, the Thai government recalled the Thai
ambassador. Later on, Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva and Minister of
Foreign Affairs Kasit Piromya threatened to revoke the said MoU, with Minister
Kasit saying that the revocation was necessary because the MoU was
negotiated and signed during Thaksin's administration. It allowed Thaksin to
know
all the inside story and important clauses in this MoU.
Such comprehension would enable Thaksin to give advice to our disadvantage
and directly impact the negotiations between Thailand and Cambodia under
the framework of the MoU.
This story line was also disclosed by Dr Panithan Wattanayakorn, deputy
secretary-general to the prime minister, which made it more believable. As a
Thai who do not want to be taken advantage of by the Cambodian who insulted
our dignity, I, of course, concurred that the move to revoke the MoU was
intended to protect the interest of Thailand.
Later on, several eminent persons appeared and considerately gave warnings
to the government on this matter with good rationale, which shook my
original beliefs.
In the end, it was the article by Dr. Kriangsak that made the whole story
become clear to me and I realised that I was completely taken in and fooled
by Minister Kasit's story, which was a hoax.
It was quite clear that there is not any clause or any wordings in the MoU
that would allow the persons who were behind the original draft an edge in
giving advice, which would be of special benefit to the Cambodia side over
the Thai side in further negotiations. The next negotiation will be under
full control of the new negotiators or the new government which would take
control of the negotiation.
The outcome of the negotiation in the joint development area with regard
to who will be responsible for what, which party would be a developer, which
job will be contracted out and to whom, and any commercial conditions,
including the proportion of revenue sharing, totally depends on the new
government. They would control the negotiation without being bound by any
conditions mentioned or even thought of by the Thaksin government in the past.
The outcome of the negotiation in the area that was agreed to be split in
various zones or blocs, which party would develop which zone and the
percentage of revenue sharing also totally depends on the new government which
controls the negotiation. No other person could, therefore, presume in
advance using their privilege.
The MoU specified that in order to negotiate further, a joint committee on
technical issues must be established, comprising both Thai and Cambodian
members.
To my knowledge, such a committee has not yet been established and there
is not any instruction or policy from the government to start the
negotiation on this matter.
If we want to thwart any chance to make use of the oil and gas supply
under the sea in the area that would benefit Cambodia, simply refraining from
establishing the joint committee and from any further negotiation would be
effective. Otherwise, if we are so troubled that Thaksin could give advice
advantageous to Cambodia, we can simply avoid by not appointing the joint
committee for further negotiation. I do not see any necessity to revoke this
MoU by any means.
Countries which have a joint boundary and overlapping maritime area will
be inseparable for thousands of years. A conflict that exists today could,
one fine day, disappear. An opportunity to develop the natural resources in
the overlapping area would still be ready to be exploited for mutual
benefit if we do not allow emotion to take control of ourselves and lead to an
unnecessary act of revocation.
However, what upset me most in this circumstance was the fact that our
Minister of Foreign Affairs gave false information to the public. This time,
it is the information related to the relation with foreign countries, which
normally the Ministry of Foreign Affairs would be especially careful and
thoroughly cautious about. When our Minister of Foreign Affairs told an
untrue story while our counterpart was aware of the fact, the integrity of the
Thai government was at stake, not only in the eyes of our counterpart but
also in the eyes of other countries in international arena who may well be
aware of the content of this MoU.
I think it is still not too late for the government to change its stance
on this issue. Do not be too confident that your proposal to revoke the said
MoU will be approved by Parliament. MPs in many parties and even those in
the Democrats do think of the national interest as the main objective. I do
not want to see the government being changed when this proposal is voted
down in the Parliament.
Until next Monday.
____________________________________
Privacy Policy © 2006 Nation Multimedia Group
(http://truehits.net/stat.php?login=nation)
November 23, 2009 06:43 am (Thai local time)
_www.nationmultimedia.com_ (http://www.nationmultimedia.com/)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
