Sam  Rainsy is right, he finally got it! 
The  real court is in Hanoi!  
It  is too bad that SRP and Sam Rainsy have spent all of these years 
fighting with  the wrong enemy-- Hun Sen (and the Cambodian People's 
Party)--the 
puppet of  Vietnam.  
One  may remember that from the beginning of his political fight, Sam 
Rainsy said  that he was not going to become an alibi to Hun Sen. I prayed that 
he was  not  going to be an alibi too long but he has been one for quite some 
time.   
>From  no seat to 26 seats in the Cambodian Assembly, he has been fighting 
the wrong  battle, the battle that has been set for him and other so-called  
oppositions just to become an alibi for democracy to the Hun Sen and the  
CPP. Regardless of what he has done and will do the result would be the  
same--the CPP will always win and either Hun Sen or his replacement will be the 
 
next prime minister running Cambodia for Vietnam. The chance of having the  
current electoral processes changed is zero. The "50% plus one" formula is  
written in stone, so to say. 
Ever  since the Khmer Rouge regime was toppled by the Vietnamese armed  
forces, most of us know that the CPP and it members were merely the  products 
of Vietnam. Some call them Vietnam's puppets, some  name Phnom Penh's 
government as the Vietnam's backed regime, others  name Cambodia as a Vietnam's 
vassal state and a few others brand members of the  CPP as Vietnamese dogs. 
Regardless what they name Cambodia, she remains a  country that is run by the 
CPP which has been heavily influenced-- if not fully  controlled-- by 
Vietnam. Therefore, why are Cambodians fighting against each  other for? Just 
to 
become the new puppets or to get the current puppets  replaced? 
Now, what are the  oppositions going to do? Are they going to fight on 
against Vietnam's  puppets or are they going to take the battle directly 
against 
 Vietnam? It makes sense to fight directly against the puppeteer rather 
than to  fight against its puppets with the same blood, doesn't it?   
HOW  can the oppositions turn the Vietnamese puppets to fight against their 
 master? 
========= 
21  December 2009 
THE  REAL COURT IS IN HANOI 
>From  28 December, I will happily let the Svay Rieng provincial court, a 
branch of the  CPP-subservient judicial system, prosecute me in absentia 
because its verdict is  known in advance like with any kangaroo court.

It’s useless and  meaningless to defend yourself before a servant. You’d 
better address the  master. Therefore, I am willing to show up and to be 
prosecuted in person in  Hanoi because my trial is a political one first 
ordered 
by Vietnam’s government  (*).

I am accused of removing a border marker with Vietnam and,  following the 
logic of the accusation, that border marker is a property jointly  owned by 
Vietnam and Cambodia. Furthermore, Vietnam’s Prime Minister Nguyen Tan  Dung 
was the first government official from the two countries to denounce my act  
and to call for my punishment (*).

Therefore, being now in a third  country, both the Vietnamese government 
and the Cambodian government can  prosecute me, and I can go either to Vietnam 
or Cambodia to be prosecuted for  the alleged crime.

I accept to go to Vietnam and to be tried there,  before a Vietnamese court 
in Hanoi, any time. There, with the Cambodian people  and the international 
community watching from some distance and with serenity, I  will be able to 
raise the real issue and to defend Cambodia’s interest. The real  issue is 
not with Sam Rainsy; it is between Vietnam and Cambodia and is related  to 
border encroachments and violation of Cambodia’s territorial integrity. I  
will denounce the unfair 1985 border treaty signed by a Cambodian puppet 
regime  led by the same prime minister for 25 years. I will defend countless 
Cambodian  farmers whose rice fields and other farmland are being seized by the 
Vietnamese  authorities with the complicity of the Hun Sen government. I 
will invoke the  1991 Paris Peace Agreements on Cambodia and its provisions on 
Cambodia’s  independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity. The 
effective  implementation of the Paris Agreements will also help solve border 
disputes with  Thailand.

I was last in Hanoi in 2002 when I was received by many  high-ranking 
government officials including… Mr. Nguyen Tan Dung, who was then  deputy prime 
minister.

Sam Rainsy
Member of  Parliament

(*) On November 4, 2009, the state-run Voice of  Vietnam radio reported, “
Regarding acts and statements made by Sam Rainsy -  President of the Sam 
Rainsy Party (SRP), who recently uprooted six temporary  poles for Marker 185 
between Vietnam’s southern province of Long An and  Cambodia’s Svay Rieng 
province – [Vietnam’s Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung ]  proposed that the 
Cambodian government take due measures to deal with Rainsy’s  acts of sabotage 
and not permit similar cases to occur, as they negatively  affect the fine 
relations between the two nations.” See original report at 
_http://tinyurl.com/ykt32ah_ (http://tinyurl.com/ykt32ah) 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to