---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gaffar Peang-Meth <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:23 PM
Subject: Time will bring wanted changes
To:


*PACIFIC DAILY NEWS*
December 30, 2009

Time will bring wanted changes

A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, Ph.D.


Tomorrow evening's sunset will end the old year, and the new year of 2010
will
be upon us, with its 365 new days for us to do what we desire: Building
a new future with our creative and productive thinking; or continuing
the old past, repeating old thoughts and actions.

Welcome to the New Year's new opportunity!

As some busily perfect a new set of resolutions, some are more focused on
figuring what went wrong in the year that's ending. Like most of you, I
have spent some time reflecting on the highs and lows of 2009. Some
memories are worth a replay; others I would just as soon forget.

University of Scranton psychology professor John C. Norcross reminds us that
"Obsessive rumination about past events can trap patients in a
self-defeating cycle from which they cannot extricate themselves. It
can actually retard healing."

But I don't think most of us obsess. So I prefer a more energizing reminder
from the Sanskrit: "Look to this day, for it is life, the very life of
life ... today well lived makes every yesterday a dream of happiness,
and every tomorrow a vision of hope. Look well, therefore, to this day.
Such is the salutation to the dawn."

I recall telling my politics students at the University of Guam: "This
moment is the only moment you have. Respect its possibilities. ... If
today seems shrouded in hopelessness, pray. ... Regardless of what this
day brings, thank God. An untouched day awaits you tomorrow."

I'd like to take credit for the expression of those sentiments, but truth
be told, I scribbled this quote from a book at an airport bookstore as
I awaited my next flight.

Thus, earlier this December I seized my moment and braved the cold and windy
winter day in America's northeastern region, and took a trip to the
nation's capital to visit someone I had met by chance some 36 years
ago: a Khmer-born former international civil servant with the United
Nations Conference on Trade and Development and retired professor at
the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, Naranhkiri
Tith.

A specialist in country analysis, Tith manages a controversial Web site
on which he calls for a "progressive and systematic overhaul" of
Cambodian society as the only way to gradually resolve Cambodia's
current economic, institutional, legal, political and social problems.

Former Czech dissident-turned-president Vaclav Havel termed a person like
Tith
"an irritant wherever he is," because as "the chief doubter of systems"
he constantly disturbs, bears witness, provokes, rebels against
pressures and manipulations because it's an intellectual's role. And
Burmese human rights icon Aung San Suu Kyi termed such a person, one
with "a questing mind" that always questions and always seek answers.

I found Tith, now "76-and-a-half," he told me, to fit what Havel and Suu
Kyi described. Tith says what he thinks, and he thinks deeply. He knows
Khmer society so well and Khmer personalities in particular. I was
privileged to be shown his scholarly works and rare collection of
documents about our shared homeland. It confirmed what he said to those
who know him that they can be sure to find him making a stand wherever
human rights and freedom of choice are at risk.

His PowerPoint presentation at SAIS earlier this year, "Khmer Empire:
Implications from its Organizational and Operational System on Present
Day Events in Cambodia," contains a comparative study of Sinicized
Vietnamese and Indianized Khmer administrative and political
organizations.

Briefly, Vietnam's "pyramid" model places the ruler at the apex of power,
with
clearly defined links flowing down to the lowest officials at the base,
governed by written code and a system of meritocracy for every rank and
role of officials.

Cambodia's model consists of "a series of concentric circles," with the
ruler with
absolute power at the center. The system is lacking in clearly defined
authority as well as in "close linkage" between the center and outer
circles, and yet, "petty centers of power" exist. Qualification for
employment or promotion is based on "quasi-hereditary family, ability
and opportunity to gain the ruler's notice."

While Vietnam embraces "clearly defined borders," Cambodia embraces the
"porous concept of hinterland or buffer zone."

Tith said, "Not much has changed since the Angkor time for the majority of
Cambodians."

Tith's presentation reveals his philosophy, backed by selected documented
literature, which he summarized in two sentences: "Cambodia needs a
total change in personal and social behavior, modus operandi, and
institutions, especially the leadership. Nothing short of totally
reinventing a new Cambodian society and individual."

I was conscious that for the few precious hours that Tith and I spent
together -- this time out of choice -- the only "light" time was a
brief opportunity to exchange greetings with the gracious Mrs. Tith.

As we parted, we acknowledged that time will certainly bring the change we
want to see and it would be a miracle if either one of us will see the
fruits of our efforts.

But miracles happen. God works in mysterious ways.

Though the Chinese proverb, "One generation plants trees, the next
generation
gets shade," flashed in my head, I reminded myself that I have this
moment, with its possibilities, I have this day to live well to make
yesterday a dream of happiness and tomorrow a vision of hope, and God's
promise of strength, comfort and light.

Happy New Year!

A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, Ph.D., is retired from the University of Guam, where
he taught political science for 13 years. Write him at [email protected].

http://www.guampdn.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/200912300300/OPINION02/912300320



-

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to