> Reading your article “Three more sought in removal of post at Svay Rieng
> border” (January 4) broke my heart.
>
> The villagers should be congratulated and taken care of by the government
> for their courage in publicly claiming their ownership of the rice paddies
> and denouncing the violation of their territory by Vietnamese authorities
> who have mismanaged the process of demarcating the border. Instead, as
> unbelievable as it may sound, these five farmers face a terrifying fate and
> the loss of their status as “good” citizens.
>

Look at their acts. They have done something on their own hands along
with Sam Rainsy. Did they do the right thing?
Look at it yourself. A small group of people disagree with border
demarkation along with their leader, Sam Rainsy. They acted illegally
whether you like it or not. They did a wrong thing. Actually, they did
it to demonstarte their disagreement with the government.
Be serious about it. Doing a wrong thing to correct a wrong thing
would never work. Sam Rainsy and that small group of people did just
that. Now they are facing their consequences.
Oh ask those people this. They did it along with Sam Rainsy in that
village. Now, they all are in trouble including Sam Rainsy. WHERE IS
SAM RAINSY TODAY?
How about those people in the group? Where are they today?


> There have been different interpretations of this story within the media,
> but at the end of the day, no one can deny the truth: Cambodian people
> living along the borders with Thailand, Laos and Vietnam no longer dare
> voice their concerns about neighbouring countries encroaching on their
> territory and stealing their land for fear of reprisals.
>

No one can say that Cambodian neighbors have not moved into Cambodian
territory. However, there is an agreement between Cambodian government
and Vietnamese government on this demarkation. We will never find the
demarkation to please everyone. So what is the best result. The two
countries have to work it out. Until then the people will struggle.


> On one hand, the government may have good reason to accuse opposition leader
> Sam Rainsy of acting as a provocateur in bringing news of Vietnam’s
> mismanagement of border posts to the public. But on the other hand, the
> government is following a course of action that could rob Cambodia of its
> strength as a nation and destroy the immunity of every parliamentarian.
>

My friend,
Sam Rainsy lead that small group of people to rise against the
decision of his own government. What do you think that the government
would do? Let us say that Sam Rainsy is the prime minister of Cambodia
today. What would he do if Hun Sen did like that?
Is prime minister Sam Rainsy going to ignore the illegal act against
his government?


> At the grassroots level, Cambodian people living along the border will no
> longer dare to stand up and protest against the theft of their land by
> neighbouring countries. At the national level, parliamentarians – both
> government and opposition – will lose confidence in their abilities to serve
> the genuine interests of the people.
>


They cannot stand up for their right. The government cannot please all
of those people at once. Nor the government can find a solution to
make them happy on both side. There is no way. The agreement between
Vietnam and Cambodia is set a fire storm. Some are happy and some are
not. The government has no position to win on this position. That's
honest. Don't tell me that prime minister Sam Rainsy would do any
better. This situation has no winning in sight.


> The government must evaluate the situation fairly if it is to effecctively
> represent the nation’s interests. I would like to appeal to the government
> to restore the prowess of elected parliamentarians and allow them to fulfil
> their duties, which are more important than those of the lower court of Svay
> Rieng. I would also like to appeal to the government to drop all charges
> against the five farmers – Prak Chea, Neang Phally, Prak Koeun, Meas Srey
> and Prom Chea – and release them without condition.
>

Sam Rainsy is dead. He acted on his own hands against his own
government in his own country. He created that opportunity for those
who hate him to be able to destroy him. He miscalculated his act.
Actually, he is a stupid leader to act like that.


> Sophan Seng
> University of Hawaii
>

And what does it make you to be since you have studied in the
University of Hawaii?
Are you smarter than others?
Are you always right since you are a student of an American
university?
By the way, are you living in Cambodia as a real Cambodian?
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to