> Hun Sen has diligently used his verbal attack, physical abuses and "the > power kill" to consolidate his seat in his desire for lifelong political > career. But as we have known his attempt is not that beneficial to Cambodian > nation as whole. It has only deteriorated the principles of democracy which > is the base to surviving Cambodian nation. >
Can you please explain to us why you are saying:"But as we have known his attemt is not that beneficial to Cambodian nation as whole."? I am not trying to say that Hun Sen is right or wrong here. I have my own opinion on that. Yet, I still can't figure out why one is right while the others are wrong. Khmer Rouge was seriously welcome by the people in Phnom Penh at last. Why do they hate Khmer Rouge now? What is the difference between Khmer Rouge then and Khmer Rouge now? > His recent move including the notorious defamation lawsuit against Madam > Sochua caused by his speech at Kompot. After, Madam Sochua tried to use her > basic rights to protect her fame, her effort has become a tool for an > authoritarian to tumble her down. > Let us face the fact here. Mu Sochea miscalculated her acts from the very beginning. She had nothing to start with. Then she opened herself for being attack. In this case, she was attacked with vengence, and she has nothing to defend herself. Her boss did the same thing. That's why he is in France now barking about how bad Cambodia is. They may have preached to make it better for Cambodia. However, the reality is that their acts have not made anything better for Cambodia. They only want to oppose everything of Hun Sen government. They have no intention to unifying the country. They only want the power to themselves as the CPP is doing today. Can you see it? If the intention to take over the power for their party for their own agenda, Sam Rainsy and CPP are no difference. Mu Sochea is about to run for her life too like Sam Rainsy did for his. Eventhough Cambodians deem to be neutral, for example, Mu Sochea still loose. There is no way that she can win. Public opinion doesn't win a court case. Evidence does. > Yes, this case has happened only in an authoritarian country, dictator > leadership or a pseudo-democracy like Cambodia. > What do you think Cambodia is? > Yes, this evidence shows us that Hun Sen can twist everything to dehumanize > his contenders in Cambodia. In order to frighten Cambodians, Hun Sen starts > with public figure like Mrs. Sochua first in order to silence people > countywide. > Perhaps, you need to go back to the events. It was Mu Sochea who reacted to what Hun Sen said in a broader context. Perhaps, he really targetted Mu. Yet, his speech did not indicate that. Then Mu took it as she was attacked. She has not proven the case that Hun Sen really attacked her yet. Many of you really believe that she was attacked by Hun Sen. Can they show us today that evidence, which would support Mu's case? Mu Sochea's case would get the same outcome if it is tried by American court. That's the reality. > So, let us sign petition here for the justice and protection of the weaks in > Cambodia.http://www.petitiononline.com/musochua/petition.html > Why should people sign petition for Mu's stupidity? What can her American friends do to help her in the Cambodian society today? Give us a break. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
