So should king only visit places where you like then? Which countries do you think that they are not good for Cambodians ? Which countries do you think that they are good for Cambodians? Why are you saying what you are saying?
On Jun 18, 10:37 pm, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote: > King's visit to Vietnam will prevail negative to > Cambodia<http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/2010/06/kings-visit-to-viet...> > > Pay a visit to a state stages on two different perspectives: a tribute and a > bilateral talk. But how King and other Cambodian leaders can pursue a > bilateral talk if Cambodian counterpart has no collateral such as business > investors or other essential contingents in Vietnam. If Cambodia cannot > pursue that perspective like Vietnam has retained in Cambodia, all > Cambodian's leader visits to Vietnam is just a tribute to supplement the > prowess of Vietnam's hegemony over Cambodia as well as to totalizing an > absolute installed government. > > Op-Ed: Khmer Young <http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/> > > King's visit to Viet shows two magnificent things: the prowess that King can > use to confront the Viet, and the prostration and gratitude the King will > tribute to the Viet. > > Each of them has its cause and effect. > > But in accordance to the letter from the so-called Office of the Monarchy as > well as the leaning down towards Viet of Hun Sen government on behalf of the > propaganda of maintaining friendship, comprehensive development, mutual > understanding and lasting cooperation; the King will ultimately pay homage > and gratitude to Viet leaders like recent visit of Leng Peng Long of Khmer > NA<http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2010/06/cambodia-creates-best-conditions...>as > well as many other government leaders and dignitaries. > > So, you wish to hear the good result after the King's visit? I am > disappointed since the preparation of this visit. It is just a visit to a > dominate state which all incumbent Khmer leaders have to maintain this > tradition. You can count all those leaders numbering from Prime Minister Hun > Sen, to Mam Som Orn of ministers cabinet, ministers of each ministries, > assembly representatives, and many other incumbent dignitaries etc are aimed > to bow down Viet's leaders in the prospect of tightening cooperation > propaganda. After the current King Sihamuni's visit, former King Norodom > Sihanouk will fully help this cooperation propaganda achievable. > > The author of this article > <http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2010/06/king-father-majestic-insult-upon...>elegantly > and wisely elaborated all aspects of the Monarchy's failure under the King > Sihanouk enthronement. Reflecting from the bas-relief of Bayon and Angkor > Wat to the present appearance of the King, we can perceive the gradual > fading away of the Khmer Monarchy, its fame and institute. > > Who has eliminated the Khmer monarchy? No one, but the King themselves; and > King Sihanouk has to take accountable to this frailty. > > How about the possible prowess that King Sihanouk should utilize to bargain > with the Viet's leaders during his visit? > > - First, Min Triet is the Viet's leader from the south, it is possible that > the South and the King as well as the South and the US, still have common > sympathy to each other. Recent reports have frequently affirmed the > differences of the South and the North in handling with the influence of > China. It confirmed about the possible strife of these two brothers. So how > King Sihanouk can see the differences and utilize it wisely? > > - King Sihanouk is a good friend of China's leaders. Will the King be able > to utilize this prowess to bargain with the Viet's leaders? The King has to > grasp his potential power to sit face to face with the Viet's leaders, not > to act as an installed government messenger. > > All these two are important for the King visit. > > But if the King visit to Vietnam this coming week just an informal and > personal visit like claimed, it is a frail of the King and the Monarchy > Institute that have never realized the bad intention of the Viet's leaders > hidden behind the word "friend", "cooperation" or "comprehensive > development" etc. > > Pay a visit to a state stages on two different perspectives: a tribute and a > bilateral talk. But how King and other Cambodian leaders can pursue a > bilateral talk if Cambodian counterpart has no collateral such as business > investors or other essential contingents in Vietnam. If Cambodia cannot > pursue that perspective like Vietnam has retained in Cambodia, all > Cambodian's leader visits to Vietnam is just a tribute to supplement the > prowess of Vietnam's hegemony over Cambodia as well as to totalizing an > absolute installed government. > > I am appreciate with Neary > Krud<http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2010/06/king-father-majestic-insult-upon...>for > her open-minded and scholarly essay. > > Regards, > > KY -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
