On Jun 25, 7:51 am, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote: > Cambodian compatriots mean all Cambodians and people who have shared > their commonality and helping each other. Why you have to distinguish > Khmer inside and outside Cambodia? So in your idea Khmer outside the > country is not Khmer or what? Why you have to create this dividing and > racism among Khmers? >
Do you really want to know why I am making the two groups different? Remember! Many Cambodians who live overseas love to yell. When you ask them to go there and help, they are going to say that they don't live there. I bet you that 90 percent of them if not more WOULD NOT go back to Cambodia. They yapyapyap like Sam Rainsy. My friend, You can make any judgement as you want. Overseas Cambodians play very small role in rebuilding Cambodia. They only provide two things, fund and yapyapyap. The reason that they are doing it because they are still missing what they used to have. Go around your Cambodian friends who live in Cambodia. Then ask them whether they would go back to Cambodia for the rebuilding of Cambodia in any circumstances. I bet you that they are going to answer that they ONLY GO BACK WITH A CERTAIN CONDITION, which will never happen. That is the truth. Please tell the world the truth how many oversea Cambodians have returned to Cambodia as their nation. Please tell the world the truth how many oversea Cambodians have returned to Cambodia as visitors. Please tell the world the truth how many oversea Cambodians have returned to Cambodia OFTEN for the purpose to rebuilding Cambodia. > The product of Hun Sen? Yes, I can see. But the money that he has > extracted with the money to build the nation is not in equilibrium. > This not including the encroachment of border land from Hun Sen's > master as well as other violence culture modelized by Hun Sen to Khmer > youths. > Thank you for realizing that today Cambodia is the product of Hun Sen leadership and CPP. Thank you for realizing that people may or may not like what Hun Sen and CPP have been doing. You did not mentioned anything at all about Sam Rainsy. Do you know why? I can answer that for you. Sam Rainsy has nothing to brag about. He is still bidding for that position. Saying that he is better is just a dream. He may be well a good leader or better leader. However he is not there yet. My personal opinion that Sam Rainsy doesn't have the leadership to do any better than Hun Sen and CPP. The main reason is that Sam Rainsy is nothing more than a divided institution. He has no reason to unite his own country. His group is the only right group. Any other ideas of groups must be wrong in his position. So, the conclusion is that Sam Rainsy cannot be a good leader for Cambodia. Don't try to tell about his ideology. It doesn't matter. If his position is where it is today, Sam Rainsy cannot be a good leader for Cambodia. Look at what he and his cronies have been doing. They label themselves as OPPOSITION. Looat at what Sam Rainsy did to get himself in trouble. Look at what Mu did to get her in trouble. The two snerios show clearly that they did in their defiance. They have no intention to make it work. They only want their own way. Any other ways must be wrong. Hence, they cannot be good leaders. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
