-----Original Message-----
From: Gaffar Peang-Meth <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Aug 17, 2010 7:46 am
Subject: CAMBODIA: "Cambodians can remain pawns, or can hang together against 
Sen's autocracy"







 



FOR PUBLICATION 
AHRC-ETC-007-2010 
August 17, 2010 
An article by Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth published by the Asian Human Rights 
Commission 
CAMBODIA: "Cambodians can remain pawns, or can hang together against Sen's 
autocracy" 
August 15, 2010 

Two weeks ago, I presented in this space a contrast of reporter Benoit 
Bringer's "Cambodge: Les enfants de la decharge" (Cambodia: The Children of the 
Garbage Dump), a five minute video, and his gallery of photos, showing how 
Cambodians scavenge Phnom Penh's public garbage dump just to survive; and 
Andrew Marshall's "Khmer Riche," published in the Jan 12 Sydney Morning Herald, 
showing the life at the opposite end of Cambodians' economic spectrum – 
Cambodia's "rich kids" who can spend "$2,000 on drinks in a single night" and 
whose parents' "newly built neoclassical mansions (are) so large that (Phnom 
Penh's) old French architecture looks like Lego by comparison." 

The contrast serves to forecast Cambodia's unpleasant future, a future the 
international community sought to avoid when it established the 1991 Paris 
Peace Accords and invested $3 billion to set Cambodia on a productive course. 
The current situation in Cambodia and the future it foretells represent an 
international failure. 

Economic Inequality, Conflict, Revolt 

Theories abound about economic inequality and its linkage with dissent, unrest, 
and rebellion by the disadvantaged. 

Greek philosopher Aristotle (384 BC-322 BC) had linked the well-being of a 
political community with the well-being of the citizens who make it up, and 
economic inequality with the revolt of the disadvantaged. His analysis on the 
causes of revolution—"The passion for equality is at the root of revolution," 
Aristotle said--has inspired students of politics and theorists until today. 

One of Aristotle's often-quoted statements reads: "It is in the interest of a 
tyrant to keep his people poor, so that they may not be able to afford the cost 
of protecting themselves by arms and be so preoccupied with their daily tasks 
(subsistence) that they have no time for rebellion." 

Inequality in Cambodia 

Much has been written about inequality in contemporary Cambodia. A few 
examples: the London-based Global Witness, an anti-graft international 
nongovernmental organization, detailed in its 2007 "Cambodia's Family Trees" 
report, Premier Hun Sen's family members, business associates and senior 
officials, dubbed the "kleptocratic elite," as allegedly engaged in illegal 
logging and stripping of Cambodia's public assets for personal profit. In 2009, 
Global Witness's "Country for Sale" report charged, "Over the past 15 years, 45 
percent of the country's land has been purchased by private interests." The 
March-April 2009 Foreign Affairs Magazine's "Cambodia's Curse," by Stanford's 
Joel Brinkley, exposed United States Embassy-funded studies in Phnom Penh that 
"showed in stunning detail that Cambodian government officials steal between 
$300 million and $500 million a year (most years, the state's annual budget is 
about $1 billion). " 

Foreign donors of aid are not blind to what has been happening in Cambodia. 
But, in the contemporary world in which big and small states still compete for 
power, influence, wealth; and as all governments are susceptible to their 
respective interest groups that may clamor for unrestricted economic investment 
opportunities in Cambodia; there should be no surprise that foreign governments 
that abhor the current situation of the average Cambodian citizen will not risk 
upsetting the ruling autocracy and denying the economic pursuits of their 
domestic constituents by advocating for the civil rights of a foreign people. 

The global civil society organization, Transparency International, that leads 
the fight against corruption, reported Cambodia ranked 158thof 180 countries 
surveyed on a TI corruption perception index for 2009. In the Aug. 2 Jakarta 
Globe's "Cambodia's Struggle With Globalization," Australian National 
University Professor Hal Hill, Asian Development Bank economist Jayant Menon, 
and Cambodia Economic Association chairman Chan Sophal, reported Cambodia ranks 
166th on the TI corruption perception index, and 135th in the World Bank's 
Doing Business Indicators, out of 181 countries surveyed. They warned: 
"Achievements over the past decade in particular could be undone by economic 
crises, or rising civil unrest driven by outrage at the political and 
bureaucratic excesses." 

Politics does strange things 

Today's Cambodia of Samdech Akka Moha Sena Padei Decho Hun Sen, (an 
aristocratic title bestowed by King Father Nororom Sihanouk, himself a former 
president of a loose coalition of three Khmer factions -- noncommunist 
nationalist KPNLF, royalist FUNCINPEC, and Khmer Rouge DK -- which fought 
Vietnamese occupation troops and the Vietnamese-installed Heng Samrin-Hun Sen 
regime), is far better than the Cambodia of Pol Pot, the master of the 
1975-1979 killing fields that took some two million lives. 

Without the King Father, China-backed Pol Pot could not have brought down the 
U.S.-backed Khmer Republic in 1975, a prelude to the occupation of Cambodia by 
Vietnamese troops in 1979-1989; and without the King Father, Sen's autocracy 
and his Cambodian People's Party cannot survive in today's Cambodia. 

Making Cambodia's current crisis more complex, Hun Sen, who was installed in 
power by the Vietnamese but is a former Khmer Rouge commander, is now the King 
Father's adopted son; and the King Father's biological son is now king of 
Cambodia. The King Father and Premier Sen need one another. Sen needs the King 
Father to legitimize his rule; the King Father needs Sen to shield him from 
criticisms of his policies in the Vietnam War era. And the Khmer traditions 
that inculcates blind obedience and unquestioned loyalty to authority, ensures 
the Cambodian autocracy's survival. 

The Love for Material Gain 

Many Cambodians simply love Sen's transformation of Pol Pot's ghost capital of 
Phnom Penh into a bustling city of 1.5 million residents, with huge villas, 
modern supermarkets, a 92-floor Gold Tower skyscraper, in a Cambodia that 
attracts over two million tourists annually. 

Recall a survey by a U.S.-based nongovernmental organization, the International 
Republican Institute, that showed 79 percent of those Cambodians polled say 
Premier Sen's Cambodia is moving in "the right direction," and cited Sen's new 
roads, modern bridges, new schools, modern complexes. 

Indeed, many Cambodians are now clothed better, housed better, and eat better, 
too. 

Except the more than 30 percent of the population of 14 million live below 
poverty line--many on less than 50 cents a day. 

The discovery of oil off Cambodia’s coastline may be a boon or a curse. 

Stability vs. Rights Conflict 

Oppression occurs when those who favor stability and security do so at the 
expense of individual rights. On the other hand, when individual rights and 
free expression are exercised without restraint, a state of "licentiousness" is 
reached which breeds instability, insecurity, and chaos. This is no less 
"oppressive." 

In 2006, the Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights 
(French acronym Licadho), issued "The Facade of Stability" report that accused 
the world community of failing to "speak out" against Sen's regular human 
rights breaches, and warned, "Cambodia's current period of relative calm is no 
guarantor of meaningful long-term stability, and ongoing, systematic human 
rights violations will, to the contrary, promote instability." 

Fast-forward. On June 2, as Sen's Supreme Court issued a guilty verdict against 
Cambodian lawmaker Mu Sochua, for demanding justice following Sen's televised 
abusive public speech against her, foreign donors who met in Phnom Penh awarded 
$1.1 billion in development aid to Sen. 

A day earlier, 15 nongovernmental organizations in Cambodia released a briefing 
paper, "Cambodia Silenced: The End Days of Democracy?" charging, "Since 2009 
freedom of expression has continued to be seriously undermined, with the Royal 
Government of Cambodia crackdown targeting the pillars of democracy in 
Cambodia: parliamentarians; the media; lawyers; human rights activists; and 
ordinary citizens." 


"Dogs continue to bark, Oxcart continues its trip forward" 

The quotation above from an e-mail to me from one of Sen's officers in Phnom 
Penh, served to remind that national and international critics and rights 
groups can say what they will, but the ruling Cambodian People's Party moves 
forward with the aid and recognition of foreign governments – a circumstance 
that legitimizes Sen's autocracy. Criticisms that break no bones are a 
tolerable irritant. The regime banned books, makes threats, violates rights and 
freedom and the rule of law, makes opponents disappear, intimidates opponents, 
because it can. 

The international community should, and could have, nearly 20 years ago, 
pressured Sen (and other Cambodian parties) to abide by the stipulations of the 
1991 Paris Peace Accord. That, the international community didn't do. 

To the contrary, it allowed the Khmer Rouge to contest the Accord; it allowed 
former Khmer Rouge commander Hun Sen, who lost the first United 
Nations-organized elections (1993) to seize the co-premiership with the winner 
to rule the country – an impractical and unworkable formula of a two-headed 
bird, devised by the King Father to appease Sen and the losing CPP at the 
expense of his son, Norodom Ranariddh. In 1997, Sen's coup d'etat ran Ranariddh 
out of town for safety abroad and killed his top officers and cadres. It was 
the international community that pressured Ranariddh to return to participate 
in the 1998 elections, thereby, legitimizing Sen's autocracy. 

Today, Sen profits from China's unconditional aid as an alternative to the aid 
from Western nations that preach at him as they write their checks. With 
Beijing tapping its feet waiting for Sen to run into its arms, the Western 
nations have lost leverage on Sen. 

The Future 

Man's hope for the future of a world order in which human rights and free 
expression can flourish must rest, in the final analysis, on how the world's 
democracies choose to deal with the world's autocracies. 

Former British diplomat, Robert Cooper, of the Council of the European Union, 
was quoted as saying, today's "struggle for power and prestige goes on as it 
always has," and "Power is at the service of ideas, but the key ideas are also 
ideas about power: democracy and autocracy." 

While the world's democracies ponder how to use their power and will to shape 
the world, Cambodian democrats and rights activists can choose to remain pawns 
while the democracies and the autocracies deal, or Cambodians can "hang 
together" in their opposition to Sen's autocracy. If they do not, they risk 
being hung separately by the dictator. 

We live in an interdependent, interconnected, globalized world. Cambodians can 
act, or not. 

............... 


About the Author: 

Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth is retired from the University of Guam, where he taught 
political science for 13 years. He currently lives in the United States. He can 
be contacted at [email protected]. 



The views shared in this article do not necessarily reflect those of the AHRC, 
and the AHRC takes no responsibility for them. 
# # # 

About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional non-governmental 
organisation monitoring and lobbying human rights issues in Asia. The Hong 
Kong-based group was founded in 1984. 



AHRC New Weekly Digest - an easy way to receive all your Human Rights news in 
just one weekly email - subscribe here.
-----------------------------
Asian Human Rights Commission
19/F, Go-Up Commercial Building,
998 Canton Road, Kowloon, Hongkong S.A.R.
Tel: +(852) - 2698-6339 Fax: +(852) - 2698-6367
twitter/youtube/facebook: humanrightsasia


Please consider the environment before printing this email.







 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to