A. RUSSIAN REVOLUTION OF 1917:
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (22 April 1870 – 21 January 1924) was a Russian Marxist 
revolutionary and communist politician who led the October Revolution of 1917. 
As leader of the 
Bolsheviks


B. SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION JUST STARTS ON SEPTEMBER  23 ,2010
Beck-promoted book pins creation of Fed on conspiracy of Jewish bankers
September 23, 2010 8:12 pm ET by Matt Gertz

Yesterday on his Fox News show, while attacking Edward House, an adviser to 
President Wilson, for his work in establishing the Federal Reserve, Glenn Beck 
promoted the book Secrets of 
the Federal Reserve. As we pointed out, the book was written by Eustace 
Mullins, a reported 9-11 truther who was called "an anti-Semitic conspiracy 
theorist" by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). 


At the beginning of his discussion of House, Beck urged his audience, "I ask 
you to do your own homework on this, don't take anything I say as truth just 
because I say it. Do your own homework. Find out if it's true. Read original 
sources." And so we did.
The ADL calls Secrets of the Federal Reserve "a re-hash of 
[Mullins'] anti-Semitic theories about the origins of the Federal Reserve." 
Based on our review, that description seems accurate. 
Secrets was commissioned by and dedicated to an American Hitler 
sympathizer who attacked the Allied governments in World War II-era broadcasts 
for Italy's Fascist government. The book tells the tale of how a sinister 
conspiracy of international financiers, led by a family of Jewish bankers to 
whom "the most powerful men in the United States were themselves answerable," 
established the Federal Reserve as part of their centuries-old plot to control 
the country.


Ezra Pound
Ezra Pound, the American Modernist poet, provides the introduction to 
Secrets; the book is also dedicated to him. And for good reason -- a 
forward Mullins wrote for the 1991 edition of the book explains that Pound was 
intimately involved in the book's creation. Mullins writes:

In 1949, while I was visiting Ezra Pound who was a political prisoner at St. 
Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (a Federal institution for the insane), 
Dr. Pound asked me if I had ever heard of the Federal Reserve System. I replied 
that I had not, as of the age of 25. He then showed me a ten dollar bill marked 
"Federal Reserve Note" and asked me if I would do some research at the Library 
of Congress on the Federal Reserve System which had issued this bill. Pound was 
unable to go to the Library himself, as he was being held without trial as a 
political prisoner by the United States government. After he was denied 
broadcasting time in the U.S., Dr. Pound broadcast from Italy in an effort to 
persuade people of the United States not to enter World War II. 
Mullins further wrote that Pound funded his research and made editorial 
suggestions and that the book was eventually published by "two of Pound's 
disciples."
Why does it matter that Pound basically came up with the idea for Mullins' 
book? Isn't he just a poet?
Did you catch the bit there about how Pound was a "political prisoner" 
because he tried to "persuade people of the United States not to enter World 
War 
II"? Here's how that looks from a less biased source:

>From 1941 to 1943, in broadcasts for the Italian government, [Pound] sang the 
praises of Mussolini and Hitler, while denigrating the Allied powers.
His main theme was invariably anti-Semitic: "That Jew in the White House... 
the kike and the unmitigated evil... the United States has been invaded by 
vermin."
[...]
Nevertheless, interned in a camp for army criminals, Pound managed to write 
his award-winning Pisan Canto, regarded by many critics as one of his finest 
achievements.
Back in the United States, though, Pound was declared unfit to stand 
trial.
He was confined for nearly 13 years in Washington's chief psychiatric 
institution, St Elizabeth's Hospital, where he entertained Stephen Spender and 
other visitors, acquiring two more mistresses among them.
[...]
Ezra Pound himself, who greeted his release from custody with a Fascist 
salute and blamed his bad press on papers such as the "Jew Pork Times", 
reflected toward the end of his life: "I have tried to write paradise. Let 
those 
whom I love forgive what I have written."
That's who proposed the book Beck promoted yesterday.
The Rothschild Conspiracy
The crux of Mullins' book is its fifth chapter, titled "The House of 
Rothschild," which details how that family of German Jewish bankers was the 
secret hand behind the plot to establish the Federal Reserve. 
Mullins writes:

The success of the Federal Reserve Conspiracy will raise many questions in 
the minds of readers who are unfamiliar with the history of the United States 
and finance capital. How could the Kuhn, Loeb-Morgan alliance, powerful though 
it might be, believe that it would be capable, first, of devising a plan which 
would bring the entire money and credit of the people of the United States into 
their hands, and second, of getting such a plan enacted into law? [Page 
47]
Mullins' answer? That's how the Jews wanted it. After referencing a 1911 
magazine article detailing how "Seven men in Wall Street now control a great 
share of the fundamental industry and resources of the United States," Mullins 
wrote of its author:

What John Moody did not know, or did not tell his readers, was that the most 
powerful men in the United States were themselves answerable to another power, 
a 
foreign power, and a power which had been steadfastly seeking to extend its 
control over the young republic of the United States since its very inception. 
This power was the financial power of England, centered in the London Branch of 
the House of Rothschild. The fact was that in 1910, the United States was for 
all practical purposes being ruled from England, and so it is today.  [Pages 
47-48]
Mullins then writes that the major U.S. banks "take their direction from 
London," i.e. the Rothschilds, who "are interesting solely in money and 
power.":

Although these firms are ostensibly American firms, which merely maintain 
branches in London, the fact is that these banking houses actually take their 
direction from London. Their history is a fascinating one, and unknown to the 
American public, originating as it did in the international traffic in gold, 
slaves, diamonds, and other contraband. There are no moral considerations in 
any 
business decision made by these firms. They are interested solely in money and 
power. [Page 48]
The ADL writes of the "Classic Anti-Semitic Myth" of "Jewish 'Control' 
of the Federal Reserve":

In the literature of bigots, the name Rothschild is a trigger for the most 
explosive of anti-Semitic tremors, and it usually sets off a litany of other 
Jewish names.
The Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral 
Commission
The Rothschilds are only one of a web of New World Order-type groups that 
Mullins portrays as central to how the Fed was established and retains power, 
including the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the 
Bilderbergers. The ADL writes of such conspiracies in an article on the 
Bilderbergers:

Various far-right extremists and conspiracy theorists, however, charge that 
the group is a shadowy force seeking to control world events, exerting 
allegedly 
dominating powers of international influence to promote a "new world order" 
under their control. The extremists claim that Presidential candidates of both 
major U.S. political parties are controlled by the Bilderberg group; among 
those 
often mentioned in such conspiracy-oriented propaganda are David Rockefeller, 
the Clintons and Henry Kissinger. Other Bilderberg leaders are said to be 
members of the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations -- 
groups which themselves are often central players in far-right conspiracy 
theories of secret efforts at domination of the world's political and financial 
institutions and the press. Such charges about the Bilderberg group were a 
regular feature in The Spotlight, the recently-defunct weekly tabloid of the 
far-right, anti-Semitic Liberty Lobby.
Mullins writes that local business leaders have "set up regional councils, on 
orders from New York, of such groups as the Council on Foreign Relations, The 
Trilateral Commission, and other instruments of control devised by their 
masters":

The shareholders of these banks which own the stock of the Federal Reserve 
Bank of New York are the people who have controlled our political and economic 
destinies since 1914. They are the Rothschilds, of Europe, Lazard Freres 
(Eugene 
Meyer), Kuhn Loeb Company, Warburg Company, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, the 
Rockefeller family, and the J.P. Morgan interests. These interests have merged 
and consolidated in recent years, so that the control is much more 
concentrated. 
National Bank of Commerce is now Morgan Guaranty Trust Company. Lehman Brothers 
has merged with Kuhn, Loeb Company, First National Bank has merged with the 
National City Bank, and in the other eleven Federal Reserve Districts, these 
same shareholders indirectly own or control shares in those banks, with the 
other shares owned by the leading families in those areas who own or control 
the 
principal industries in these regions. The "local" families set up regional 
councils, on orders from New York, of such groups as the Council on Foreign 
Relations, The Trilateral Commission, and other instruments of control devised 
by their masters. They finance and control political developments in their 
area, 
name candidates, and are seldom successfully opposed in their plans. [Page 
34-35]
He writes of the "secret association" known as the Round Table:

After World War I, the Round Table became known as the Council on Foreign 
Relations in the United States, and the Royal Institute of International 
Affairs 
in London. The leading government officials of both England and the United 
States were chosen from its members. In the 1960s, as growing attention 
centered 
on the surreptitious governmental activities of the Council on Foreign 
Relations, subsidiary groups, known as the Trilateral Commission and the 
Bilderbergers, representing the identical financial interests, began 
operations, 
with the more important officials, such as Robert Roosa, being members of all 
three groups. [Page 54]
Mullins also writes that these groups were the power behind President Jimmy 
Carter and his Federal Reserve chair, Paul Volcker, whose "course has always 
been charted for him by his masters in London":


On July 26, 1979, The [New York] Times commented that Volcker learned "the 
business" from Robert Roosa, now partner of Brown Brothers Harriman, and that 
Volcker had been part of the Roosa Brain Trust at the Federal Reserve Bank of 
New York, and, later, at the Treasury in the Kennedy administration. "David 
Rockefeller, the chairman of Chase, and Mr. Roosa were strong influences in the 
Mr. Carter decision to name Mr. Volcker for the Reserve Board chairmanship." 
The 
New York Times did not point out that David Rockefeller and Robert Roosa had 
previously chosen Mr. Carter, a member of the Trilateral Commission, as the 
presidential candidate of the Democratic Party, or that Mr. Carter would hardly 
refuse to appoint their choice of Paul Volcker as the new Chairman of the 
Federal Reserve Board. Nor is it straining the point to be reminded that this 
manner of selection of the Chairman of the Board of Governors is directly in 
the 
line of royal prerogative going back to George Peabody's initial agreement with 
N.M. Rothschild, to the Jekyll Island meeting, and to the enactment of the 
Federal Reserve Act.
 The Times noted that "Volcker's choice was approved by European banks in 
Bonn, Frankfurt and Zurich." William Simon, former Secretary of Treasury, was 
quoted as saying "a marvelous choice." The Times further noted that the Dow 
market rose on Volcker's nomination, registering the best gains in three weeks 
for a rise of 9.73 points, and that the dollar rose sharply on foreign exchange 
at home and abroad.
Who was Volcker, that his appointment could have such an effect on the stock 
market and the value of the dollar in foreign exchange? He represented the most 
powerful house of "the London Connection," Brown Brothers Harriman, and the 
London houses which directed the Rockefeller empire. On July 29, 1979, The 
Times 
had said of Volcker, "New Man Will Chart His Own Course".
Volcker's background shows that this was nonsense. His course has always been 
charted for him by his masters in London
[...]
Behind Volcker and Solomon stands Robert Roosa, Secretary of the Treasury in 
Carter's shadow cabinet, and representing Brown Brothers Harriman, the 
Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, and 
the Royal Economic Institute. He is a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation, 
and 
a director of Texaco and American Express companies. Dr. Martin Larson points 
out that "The international consortium of financiers known as the 
Bilderbergers, 
who meet annually in profound secrecy to determine the destiny of the western 
world, is a creature of the Rockefeller-Rothschild alliance, and that it held 
its third meeting on St. Simons Island, only a short distance from Jekyll 
Island." Larson also states that "The Rockefeller interests work in close 
alliance with the Rothschilds and other central banks." [Pages 171-173]



> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 03:02:46 -0700
> Subject: Re: Exiled Cambodian Leader Sentenced to 10 Years in Jail
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 23, 3:46 pm, "Sam Rainsy Party of North America"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Exiled Cambodian Leader Sentenced to 10 Years in Jail
> >
> > Exiled Cambodian opposition party leader Sam Rainsy who has been convicted 
> > by a court for falsifying documents related to a contentious border dispute 
> > with Vietnam.
> >
> 
> Misleading accusation with no supported facts.
> They were not convicted for falsifying anything.
> They were convicted for destroying the border demarkation. That is
> fact.
> 
> > The leader of Cambodia's main opposition party, Sam Rainsy, was sentenced 
> > to prison in a dispute about the border with neighboring Vietnam. But his 
> > supporters claim the case is politically motivated.
> >
> 
> It may be a political motivated. Yet, the court could prove easily
> because Sam Rainsy and his followers did removed the border
> demarkation with their own hand to demonstrate about a disputed land.
> They chose to go that way instead of using diplomacy.
                                          

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to