On Oct 21, 10:04 am, Jayakhmer <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that is right. People are smart. We get it. It may take some > people with thick skulls one thousand times to learn something, for > most of us once or twice is more than enough. > > As far as the truth is concerned, you think you have the truth, but > in reality you may have just a fraction of the truth. You made > general statements all over the place. Most of your statements are > invalid about Cambodian culture and Cambodian people. >
It seems that you know more than I do. Unfortunately, you have not given us anything except saying that it's not true, or partly true. What is the correct or full version? Give it to us so we can understand. > Like I said, not all apples are green. Not all Cambodian people fit > in your description or your prognosis. > Why do you think that Cambodians don't fit in that category? Give us your version of Cambodians. > I always have problem with what you said, but I have been patient and > gave the benefit of doubt thinking that you are a rational and > reasonable people. Now I truly know. You cannot understand the > different between valid and invalid statement. > You said it yourself. You always have problem with what I said. So it means that you always have problem with what I say no matter what. Whether it's right or wrong. You already label it. You have choices. You can reply, ignore, or discuss it. You have chosen to return repeatedly. And you keep saying that you are tired of hearing this and that because it is not to your vision. Yet, you have offered nothing to discredit it. Give us your version. Why did you say that it's partly true? Why did you say it's not true? Give us some sense so we can discuss to believe you. If you say Cambodians are great people, you have not given us anything. The statement itself only a hearsay. A hearsay would become reality when support evidence used to make the story believeable. Give it to us since you seem to know so much about Cambodia. > You keep saying, "this is a typical Cambodian behavior." Have you > ever examined your behavior? What kind of behavior is that? Is that > how a gentle mam or educated man should behave? > If you read the sentence itself, what do you see? Is it targeted an individual/ Read your own writing. What are you saying or targetting? An individual? You have claimed to be a Cambodian yourself. Obviously, you are since you are so offended by the criticism. You are displaying that behavior yourself. You are showing it yourself. Your behavior is the proof of what I said. You did it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
