I heard the White French are very racist people, and their society is
adopted adultery custom.
What a 15 years old went strike is not odd, the Muslim children go to
strike at a very young ages.
The unique thing is the leader husband and wife Sarkozy and Carla
Bruni both having affairs.

On Nov 1, 12:29 am, [email protected] wrote:
> October 31, 2010
>
> Why the French LoveSocial Conflict
>
> By Theo Vermaelen
>
> France is in many ways a uniquecountry. Where else in the world could you see 
> a 15-year-old appear on TVsaying that he is striking because he would like to 
> retire at 60 instead of 62?Where else could you see a leading politician such 
> as Segolene Royalencouraging 15-year-olds to go on strike? In any other 
> country Ms. Royal wouldbe part of the Loony Left, but here she got 47 % of 
> the votes in the recentpresidential election and is considered a mainstream 
> socialist candidate forreplacing Sarkozy in 2012. Where else would 71 % of 
> the people support strikerswho block refineries so that they have to wait 
> hours in line to fill up theircars?  
>
> Even supposedly right-wing politicianssuch as Dominique de Villepin, ex-prime 
> minister under Chirac, have endorsedthe 15-year-olds' position, claiming that 
> if people retire later, the youngerwill have to wait longer for a job. This 
> statement is probably the most pureform of static economic thinking ever 
> pronounced -- i.e., the idea that thelabor market consists of a fixed number 
> of slots. If this were the case, wecould simply eliminate youth unemployment 
> by lowering the retirementage to 45.
>
> After 9/11, many of us tried tounderstand why so many Saudis supported 
> Islamic terrorism, and the answer wasoften found in school textbooks that 
> openly preached hatred against the nonbelievers.A similar exercise should be 
> done to better understand the French mind. What dothe French learn in school 
> to make them support economic terrorism and chaos aslong as it is organized 
> by the working class?
>
> Except for students in a specialeconomics section, French high school 
> students get no education in economics orfinance.So one explanation for the 
> French attitude is the fact that the vast majorityof the people have no basic 
> understanding of economics or markets. Those whoget economics training in 
> high school probably get a muddled message. I gotthis impression after taking 
> a closer look at the content of the economicscourses of the last year of the 
> "lycée," or high school.  
>
> The topics discussed seem moreappropriate for a sociology course. Out of the 
> seven courses of the curriculum,four have titles such as "Social 
> Stratification and Inequality,""Conflict and Social Mobilization," 
> "Integration andSolidarity," and "European Integration and Economic and 
> SocialPolicies." There is no discussion of microeconomics (demand and supply) 
> orfirm optimizing behavior such as profit (or value) maximization or 
> discussionof financialmarkets or free markets in general.  
>
> The seeds of anti-capitalism andanti-Americanism can be found throughout the 
> curriculum. One chapter deals with"Conflict and Social Mobilization." After a 
> thorough analysis ofMarxist thinking and an almost sad note that the 
> influence of workers has diminished(because they are fewer workers, and the 
> ones that became wealthier lost theirclass-identification), the authors still 
> conclude that
>
> [t]he reasons for the conflict with the other socialclasses remain strong. 
> Although workers participate in mass consumption theyuse fewer services than 
> other classes: they go less on holidays than others,they have less accessto 
> the internet and they don't have maids or nannies.  
>
> In short, French people are stilltaught today that class warfare is the 
> nature of (French) society and willremain as long as not all classes are 
> equal. Of course, equality is notpossible, as it would require that either 
> all maids have maids or that therewould be no maids.
>
> The chapter on "Work andEmployment" explains unemployment only as a result of 
> technologicalprogress where machines replace workers. Nowhere can a 
> discussion be found onhow social charges, taxes, and labor regulations (such 
> as the minimum wage) cancontribute to unemployment.
>
> The icing on the cake is thestatement in the section on "Conflict and Social 
> Mobilization", whichis supposed to be a consolation for all of us waiting in 
> the gas lines:
>
> A priori we often tend to think that conflicts are useless,they are better 
> avoided. Not at all what sociologists think: conflict makeschange possible. 
> Social conflicts, because they put individuals into action,also contribute to 
> form identities and develop solidarity. The first difficultyfor you in this 
> chapter is therefore the need to consider conflict in apositive role.
>
> Luckily, the French government hasmore or less responded as the Saudi 
> government did after 9/11: starting thisyear, all high school students (not 
> just the ones of the economics section)will have to take a course in 
> economics, and the curriculum will be changed.The goal of the curriculum will 
> be to better understand how companies,households, and the state behave and 
> how markets allocate resources, includinglabor markets and financial markets. 
> So there is some serious hope that in thefuture, corporations will no longer 
> be depicted as entities to fight, butinstead as the ultimate creators of 
> wealth.
>
> Predictably, when the reforms wereproposed at the beginning of this year, 
> Francois Dubet, the only sociologist onthe curriculum committee, resigned in 
> protest, stating that "[n]ow thecorporation will no longer be seen as a place 
> where people work, or like asocial entity, but as a unit of production that 
> has to continuously adapt to achanging environment."
>
> Let's hope Mr. Dubet is right. Andperhaps then the French will someday 
> understand that when the supply of oil iscut by striking workers, the price 
> of gasoline at the pump will rise.
>
> Theo Vermaelen is Professor of Finance, INSEAD.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to