US Ready to Back Bigger EU Stability Fund: Official
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:38:27 -0800



In a 1952 book, Secrets of the Federal Reserve, Mullins blamed Paul Warburg, 
Bernard Baruch, and other WALL STREE American BANKERS  for . According to 
Mullins, The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 put the nation's banking reserves in 
the hands of the " International Bankers" for the purpose of carrying out a 
plan for world dictatorship. The German edition of the book was burned in West 
Germany in 1955. It was the first book publicly burned in West Germany since 
the defeat of the Nazi government. 
He was a veteran of the USAF, with 38 months of active service during World War 
II. 
 
US Ready to Back Bigger EU Stability Fund: Official ?
solution ?



Book " Dismantling America: and other controversial essays "Thomas Sowell




Published: Wednesday, 1 Dec 2010 | 2:20 PM ET 

The United States would be ready to support the extension of the European 
Financial Stability Facility via an extra commitment of money from the 
International Monetary Fund, a U.S. official told Reuters on Wednesday. 





"There are a lot of people talking about that. I think the European Commission 
has talked about that," said the U.S. official, commenting on enlarging the 750 
billion euro ($980 billion) EU/IMF European stability fund. "It is up to the 
Europeans. We will certainly support using the IMF in these circumstances." 
"There are obviously some severe market problems," said the official, speaking 
on condition of anonymity. "In May, it was Greece. This is Ireland and 
Portugal. If there is contagion that's a huge problem for the global economy." 
The remarks foreshadow a visit to Europe this week by a U.S. Treasury envoy who 
is expected to visit Berlin, Madrid and Paris to hold talks on the 
ramifications of the debt crisis. 
(Another news report, however, raised questions about the true extent of the US 
commitment. Read more here).
The developments have echoes of the pressure applied by Washington on European 
capitals last May to create the near $1 trillion EFSF safety net that was last 
week used to rescue Ireland after its banking crisis spiraled out of control. 
The IMF, whose biggest single shareholder is the United States, has committed 
250 billion euros to the EFSF. 
While reluctant to dictate to Europe how it should address the unfolding debt 
crisis, the U.S. government is growing concerned about the global fallout of 
Europe's predicament. 
U.S. Treasurys' prices fell and the euro strengthened against the dollar on 
Wednesday after the news that the United States would be prepared to support an 
enlarged EFSF. 
Germany, whose leaders have expressed frustration at the market backlash 
against their plans to solve the euro zone's debt problems, does not want to 
make the stability fund larger. \
 
SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BY EUSTACE MULLINS.

 Are We Fighting To Preserve? 

"Even during the Cold War, the federal reserve system continued to finance the 
Soviet Union -- which was "never" a viable economy; it was a Third World 
economy. And we continued to finance, through the federal reserve system, 
through the Bank for International Settlements, in Switzerland. That's how we 
kept the Soviet Union going all these years. That's why we had to spend $248 
billion a year for defense against this monstrous Soviet Union during the Cold 
War!."   SAID EUSTACE MULLINS  



AMERICA IS RUN BY NON ELECTED OFFICIALS,  FROM THE COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELATIONS 
, SUCH AS COL EDWARD HOUSE, ALGER HISS, HENRY KISSINGER (1)1910-2010. BY 
MR.EUSTACE MULLINS SINCE 1953  THIS BOOK " the secrets of the Federal reserve 
..".




































  
 Thu Nov 11, 10:42 AM ET 


WHO HAS SENT HER LOVE ONE TO DIE IN FOREIGN LAND ?
Council on Foreign Relations panel advises Obama to scale back Afghan 
occupation AFP

Kissinger, in His Own Words 
"Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign 
policy." - Henry Kissinger, quoted in "Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United 
States Betrayed Its Own POW's in Vietnam" 
 
FOR CAMBODIA ?




  Strong Resolution on Cambodia Human Rights Abuses 
Feb. 27, 1982 : UN Commission on Human Rights meeting in Geneva adopted a 
resolution condemning Vietnam’s occupation of Cambodia as a violation of 
Cambodian human rights. The vote was 28 in favor, 8 against, and 5 abstentions.
 
Oct. 21, 1986 The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution A/RES/41/6, by vote 
of 116-21 with 13 abstentions, calling for a withdrawal of Vietnamese forces 
from Cambodia.
 
10 UN RESOLUTIONS,(1979-1988) VOTED BY 116 UN MEMBER COUNTRIES ,CALL VIETNAM TO 
CEASE HER OCCUPATION OF CAMBODIA & REMOVE ALL HER TROOPS FROM THE COUNTRY, ARE 
NOT RESPECTED AS OF TODAY. 
 
President Reagan's address to the 43d Session of the United Nations General 
Assembly in New York, New York,September 26, 1988. 
"Mr. Secretary-General, there are new hopes for Cambodia, a nation whose 
freedom and independence we seek just as avidly as we sought the freedom and 
independence of Afghanistan. We urge the rapid removal of all Vietnamese troops 
...." 
 
As of today,Cambodia is still occupied by the Vietnamese troops despite the 
call from the US president to Vietnam to cease her occupation of Cambodia since 
1988. 
Cambodia needs Independence from Vietnam and the Vietnamese invaders.
Vietnam must cease her occupation of Cambodia at once.


BURY
 







 
> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:05:55 -0800
> Subject: Re: Kangaroo look at this!
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> 
> Hello, Kangaroo.
> 
> I have read your esponse. I undertood your mind that is good for you
> and Vietnamese society, but in term of good vision for the next, I see
> your ability is only for your own basic information, but not for
> others.
> 
> I think that you have a very big gap between me so that I have not
> need to talk on anyting with you anymore.
> 
> Thank you with my best regard.
> Neak Kampuchea,
> 
> On Dec 1, 10:22 am, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 1:40 pm, Neak Kampuchea <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Kangaroo, good to see you again.
> >
> > > I said Vietnam is trapped in nationalism barrier. You said Vietnam
> > > doesn't trap on anything. So you and me have a big gap between,
> > > meaning that you do not have enough information on both counties as I
> > > do.
> > > .
> >
> > Ok! Why are we discussing Vietnamese matter anyway?
> >
> > > A lot frozen stuffs sold in the US doesn't mean that country is
> > > strong, but for me I think of cheap labor over there, in which there
> > > are Million and million very poor workers.
> >
> > Whatever made in Vietnam that you see in your nearby super market
> > translates into billions of dollars for Vietnam. Even when those poor
> > people get very little of that still make up billions of dollars for
> > Vietnam.
> > My friend,
> > This is the mentality of Cambodia. If the poor people could not get so
> > much, the country should not do at all. It means that Cambodians
> > really don't want anything at all when no one can fullfill their
> > rhetorics.
> > That's why Cambodians have been struggling all of these years.
> >
> > > Cambodia is going the other way around, having more than 60 private
> > > universities with international curriculum standard, there are hundred
> > > all English schools anywhere in the country, more than thousand
> > > churches, more than three thousand NGO, more than hundred channel
> > > private TV cable and free Satellite TV.
> >
> > What is the benefits of those things?
> > Does it translate into money for their country?
> > Give us a sense of what fuel the country, economy or politics?
> > That's the point. Vietnamese tried so hard to get their hands in the
> > American economy because they know that American consumers can bring
> > them billions of dollars.
> > Do you know that a major American car manufacturer built a plant in
> > Vietnam?
> > Do you know that AT&T also has a plant in Vietnam?
> > How about Cambodia?
> > Do you know how many casinos they have over there?
> > Do yu know how much forest have they destroyed in the last few
> > decades?
> > Do you know how long have they disputed politically in their own
> > country?
> > What do they translate into? Prosperity for Cambodia?
> > Do you know that they tax an import car more than the cost of the car
> > itself?
> > What kind of economy is that?
> >
> > > Cambodian can spend on the street US dollars or keep them on any bank.
> > > They can even criticize on government but not defame them.
> > > Kangaroo, Vietnam has all of what Cambodia has today?
> >
> > So you are telling us that Cambodian money doesn't mean anything.
> > Am I hearing right?
> > I know certain country that it is illegal to do commerce with other
> > money instead of their own because it would devalue it.
> > So you are saying that it's better in Cambodia to use dollars instead
> > of riels?
> >
> > > Please response to me. Thank you very much.
> > > With my best regard.
> >
> > Don't worry about me so much.
> > I respond to you when I feel like it.
> > Don't stress over it.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
> This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
> Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
> 
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
> Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
                                          

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to