Incumbent Political Institution of
Cambodia<http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/2010/12/incumbent-political-institution-of.html>
<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_jVCbxaOxjhA/TRRTHmdddfI/AAAAAAAAAWU/4YIBVvfMDro/s1600/Neatee%2BKoun%2BKhmers.JPG>
EXPLORING THE CONCEPT OF POLITICAL
INSTITUTIONS<http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2010/12/neatee-koun-khmers-exploring-concept-of_22.html>

Note that many Cambodian people see that Hun Sen is smart because he knows
how to utilize those thousand advisers around him to lead the country. This
perception is absolutely wrong. Hun Sen has no critical thinking to operate
and envision the government at all. Yes, Hun Sen, Chea Sim and Heng Samrin
have shared the same value "No Critical Thinking in Building Political
Institution" at all. They just work according to others' envisioning.


As Koun Khmer has clearly simplified the theory and debate of political
institution, and his scholarship has articulated in general. Hence, readers
can use this profound writing to dig out incumbent Cambodian political
institution.

The article has showed us clearly that two alternatives keeping power for
autocracratic regime like current Cambodian government are the winning
coalition and a large selectorate. According to the theory he quoted in his
academic preference, Bueno et al has intentionally concluded that many
developing countries which have headed towards democracy finally ended up in
autocracy. Cambodia is one of them which is currently carrying a facade of
democracy.


   - Judicial system is a mockery institution to back the winning coalition.
   - The opposition party is still very weak and it is not included in
   political institution of the nation. Evidently, this vibrant political party
   has been marginalized and discriminated by the ruling government.
   - Election has been carried out by biased committees and unfair of media
   and budget contribution.
   - Monarchy has been used to legitimize the winning coalition.
   - The assembly is not independent.
   - No democratic countries in this world that has kept one leader for
   unlimited mandate.
   - No check and balance in Cambodia.
   - Cambodian people are being used as the political tools to bargain power
   and foreign aids
   - The past trauma and suffering of Cambodian people has been used to
   weaken them more and worsen the situation.


All these are coinciding with the theory of "Don
Dien<http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/2007/06/vietnamization-strategies-and.html>"
used by Vietnamese scholars and leaders to expand their territory hundred
years ago. Don Dien simply means "clearing the dense forest in order to set
up village and village operating system". Expanding approaches counting from
Champa to Prey Norkor, and to current Kampuchea Krom, it has shared these
same tactics.

Now, it is Cambodia! After the whitening out of political institution during
Khmer Rouge regime, the coming of Vietnamese troops and their experts
immediately structured and managed to operate Cambodian political
institution. Yes, the Vietnamese leaders tried to catch Sihanouk to stay in
power, but Chinese commandos took his away.

The presence of UNTAC in Cambodia didn't help break this installed political
institution at all. As the result, until now Cambodian political institution
has been only added on to the existing figure to make it stronger and
lasting. 98% of former installed leaders within this structure has been
remained the same and slightly changed.

According to Thanh, a Vietnamese
writer<http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2010/12/exchange-between-thanh-and-sokhom.html>has
lamented that Vietnamese people have to struggle against their former
powerful enemy, China. All tactics including growing population and
swallowing its neighbors is the key objective of all Vietnamese leaders.
Cambodia and Lao has been the key target for Vietnamese leadership to expand
as well as to absorb in the manner of impostoring in order to hide from
China's eagle eyes. Our lesson has been repeated again like during the Khmer
Rouge regime. After Ho Chi Minh disengaged from China to independently
operate their country and invade Cambodia, Uncle Ho had back-up plan already
in hand ie to impostor all their cadres within the Khmer Rouge troops to
secretly work within Khmer Rouge groups.

At the moment, Chinese aids and investment has undeniably benefited the
installed structure which has employed many impostering leaders. If we
closely eye on Ho Namhong, he visited China and makes friend with China at
the outside appearance only, internally Ho Namhong has good plan to
undermine China.

Ho Namhong is not different from Ieng Sary who many scholars wondered that
why Ieng Sary had successfully implored many foreign Khmer scholars to go
back home and those were terribly executed. During the returning back and
dissolution of Khmer Rouge group, Ieng Sary was the first Khmer Rouge and
possibly only one him who got a very good favor from the government. Recent
speech of Ho Namhong on threatening to closs UNs headquarter in Cambodia is
not simple, and it is not from Hun Sen idea. It is clearly from Ho Namhong
who is one among other expert of this impostering structure.

The summary of those two alternatives of keeping autocratic government in
power in Cambodia are following:

What are those factors endorsing winning coalition?
1. Cambodian monarchy
2. Cambodian Buddhist Sangha
3. Patron-clientele value embedding within major Cambodian people.

What are those factors endorsing a large selectorate?
1. Commune and village chiefs which are pineapple eyes for government
2. Kleptocratic network
3. Economic monopoly
4. Major representatives in the assembly...etc

Scenario I:
Mr. Va Kimhong is a leading man of drumming border issue to strategically
achieve: change Cambodian history in favor of neo-imperialism of Vietnam and
to disengage Khmer Kampuchea Krom from Cambodia as well as to test its
prowess of new political institution Vietnam has built since 1979.

Scenario II:
Mr. Ho Namhong will lead a successful foreign policy to contaminate all
international credentials that can ensure Cambodian sovereignty.

Scenario III:
A bunch of advisers within the government will try to ensure that Monarchy,
Buddhism and Ruling Party are binding together strongly.

Note that many Cambodian people see that Hun Sen is smart because he knows
how to utilize those thousand advisors around him to lead the country. This
perception is absolutely wrong. Hun Sen has no critical thinking to operate
and envision the government at all. Yes, Hun Sen, Chea Sim and Heng Samrin
have shared the same value "No Critical Thinking in Building Political
Institution" at all. They just work according to others' envisioning.

>From scenario I to III, we can come up to denounce who are Khmer Traitors
exactly.

I would like to conclude my discussion in this week forum now and see you
again soon.

With Love!

Khmer Young

-- 
Cambodian Brighter Future depends on enduring conscience and tireless
strivings of Cambodian Younger Generation!
http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to