You can also use two empty condensed milk cans with a long thread.
You can communicate that way.
Oh! It's free for the airtime.


On May 23, 3:54 pm, Pierre Henri de Poipet <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Dear Kim Vong,
>
> You just confirmed what I didn't know before.
> Instead of using cell phone, I use coconut phone : it emits very small 
> radiation
> but you need to speak louder.
>
> http://www.coloribus.com/adsarchive/prints/la-casa-del-agua-de-coco-c...
>
> Joe
>
> ________________________________
> De : Kim vong <[email protected]>
> À : [email protected]
> Envoyé le : Lun 23 mai 2011, 8h 26min 30s
> Objet : Should You Be Careful of Your Cell Phone's Radiation?
>
> Dear all,
> Like  it or not, cell phones have become an integral part of everyday society 
>  
> for millions of people. In the United States alone, 250 million people  have
> cell phones. When you take the rest of the world into account,  you're looking
> at over five billion cell phone users.  It's hard to believe that not all that
> long ago these phones were  considered luxury items! The craziest part is, 
> even
> though we've written  about the effects of cell phone radiation on brain 
> tissue
> before, scientists still don't know the extent to which cell phone use may
> effect our brains.
>
> Now, a new study has proven unequivocally that the radiation emitted from cell
> phone antennas alters our brain activity. While these effects may not
> necessarily be harmful, it's impossible to argue any longer that cell phone
> usage has no physical impact on brain tissue.
>
> The research, which took place through the National Institutes of Health in
> Bethesda, Maryland,  focused on the brain's increased metabolism of glucose
> while using a  cell phone. The 47 study volunteers underwent PET scans while
> holding  cells phones to their heads that were either off or on but muted. 
> The  
> scientists discovered that more than 50 minutes of exposure to a cell  phone
> that is on boosts activity in the area of the brain nearest the  antenna by
> approximately seven percent.
>
> The amount of electromagnetic radiation coming off of a cell phone is 
> relatively
> small, but this study was  designed to pick up even small changes in brain
> metabolism. And it  leaves no question that the brain responds to the weak
> signals when they  are in close proximity. Since it is only within the last 20
> years that  cell phone use has truly exploded, its long-term effects are as 
> yet  
> unknown, and the research performed to date is inconclusive as to  exactly how
> much -- and what kind of -- damage we are causing when we  use cell phones
> regularly.
>
> And use them regularly we do. Especially the under-30 segment  of the
> population, for whom cell phones are the primary means of  communication. More
> and more people are giving up landlines and only  using cell phones, which 
> means
> that many of us are using our cell phones  for a good deal longer than the
> 50-minute threshold outlined in the  study as the point at which our brain
> activity reacts to the radiation  exposure.
>
> No one knows for sure whether this exposure can cause brain tumors or other
> abnormalities, at least in part because the vast majority of the studies on 
> cell
> phone safety have been funded by none other than the cell phone industry.
> Nothing like an unbiased opinion, right? But even industry-funded studies have
> found significant increased risks of brain cancer and genetic damage, and that
> risk hovers around 20 percent for each accumulated year of cell phone use.
>
> Many cancer specialists and neurosurgeons take precautions  themselves with 
> cell
> phones and recommend others do the same. Do some  research and purchase a 
> phone
> with low radiation emission; use a Bluetooth or other hands-free device such 
> as
> a wired earbud with a built-in mic  even when you're not driving; don't use 
> your
> cell phone when you have a  weak signal; limit the time your children use cell
> phones, since they  are more vulnerable to the radiation; use the speaker
> instead of holding  the phone to your ear; and text instead of calling -- but
> never when  driving a car. These suggestions may not eliminate the risk, but
> will  hopefully provide enough protection to keep our brains safe.
>
> For more about this good carbs vs bad carbs, click here.
> --
>
> Name: Kimvong PEA
> Educ   : BM/BPS
> Tel:       016 599 599
> E-mail: [email protected]
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) -www.cambodia.org" group.
> This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
> Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
> Learn more -http://www.cambodia.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to