** On Wednesday, August 7, 2013 4:01:44 PM UTC-7, Mekong River wrote: > > Kanarloo > > If the NEC was independent and neutral from the start, disputes would not > have arisen. Simple. > > This body needs to be reformed - no more CPP nominees. > *OK!Kanarloo understood. If they are perfect, then there should be no dispute. I understand that. Unfortunately, the world isn't that way all the time, is it?* *Cambodia IS NOT an under developed country. They are still working from the ground up with whatever they have. They may not be doing it the best they can do. Things are pretty shaky there. The Cambodian people deserve peace and developping for the sake of their better future. I don't live there. I don't care. I'm saying this because I care and see things that would harm them. * *As you already know, Cambodia has not become a trusted country when it comes to investment from foreign countries like USA etc.... How many American company have you seen doing business in Cambodia? You may have seen small businesses own by people from America and many others whose business is dealing wth prominet American businesses. As you all know, the majority of garment factories in Cambodia are owned by people from other countries. They produce products for American companies to sell in America. There have been no direct business transaction between Cambodia and America. * *That's billions of dollars transaction. Would you want to loose it? Who is the victims then?*
> > How could the opposition lead in the counting in many provinces and then > the CPP came out telling they won, after ordering the NEC and TVK to stop > counting and broadcasting, 1 hour into the counting ? > I'm not disputing what you are saying. I have never said that Hun Sen, NEC and anything like that are good, bad and / or ugly. What I'm saying is that political stability will not bring good things for Cambodia. The poor people will suffer. That's what I'm saying. Sam Rainsy and his party are in good position right now. If they want to make the matter worse, then mass demonstration will help their cause. If they believe in making the lives of the people better, then they ought to think about what is better for Cambodia, not just for Sam Rainsy and his party. > > A CPP in-law was talkingtop me all night that the CPP people had theri > faces turing black after seeing 7777777...everywhere. > I respect your opinion. It still doesn't tell me anything about their political stability, and future investment for growth etc...... We have heard that Sam Rainsy and his clans preaching about giving the raise to government workers, new programs for elderly etc.... I know they are very popular for votes. In reality, those programs cost money. Please tell me where they get the money from. Please don't tell me that the elimination of corruption would help them. It's not going to happen. If those people who suck the money into their pockets cannot make any more money, they will shut down their businesses. Who is going to suffer? Those corrupted money will be no more money. Here is facts. Cambodia cannot stand on their own feet right now. They need foreign aids to survive. It has been like that for decades. Cambodia spend a lot more money than their own GDP. These are facts, not fiction. So how are you going to produce new programs hoping that eliminating corruption would solve the problems? Corruption money is not a sure thing. They may be able to eliminate or reduce corruption. Yet, they can't get the money from the corruption for something else because it's not going to be there. > > He said to me ..." Pao-on, we lost Pursat, BBang, B Meanchey, K cham, PP, > Kanddal. Prey veng....even Sihanoukville went to th Opposition...some of us > t just left the booths feeling humiliated, in office Boeng Keng 1, the CPP > won by 3 votes only becuase the residents are mainly CPP higher ups". > > If you have read my writing, I have never said CPP or Sam Rainsy have won anything. I have very little interest in that. I look at the interest of the Cambodian people who have to survive in any situation. The government and politicians can steer their country one way or another. The people have to go along with them. Sometimes they gain and sometimes they loose. What I'm saying is that putting Cambodian interest first should be the name of the game. What Sam Rainsy is trying to do like mass demonstration is not a great interest for the Cambodian people. You may disagree with me on that. But that's my opinion. > > After the coup threat and troop deployment, Mr Hennessy came out declaring > ----CPP 68, CNRP 55..... > > > Hun Sen spent days soul searching in his hole....yet he he came out his > face was still visibly pale and depressed... > > Khmer people revolution has been in the hatching....it has arrived...in > different style from the Middle East. Thansk to our youths... > > > My friend, The Cambodian people have the power. Hun Sen and CPP have been in power for decades. Many Cambodians accepted them as their government. Actually, you have seen it before your eyes. Cambodia today is the product of CPP leadership. You cannot dispute that. You and Sam Rainsy may be able to do better. But that is the fact. > > > > > > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
