> > There are two more cents to this one. > Sam Rainsy is going to say that he would not recognize crooked court of Cambodia. Does he have a legitimate say on that one? Let's look at it. First, we would like Sam Rainsy to tell what kind of court he recognizes. Then, he should be asked when that kind of court will exist in Cambodia. Then, ha should answer this question:" Are you going to disrespect any court that you don't like?" We shall see what he is going to say? Cambodia has come a very long to where it is today. This is what they have. They may not be good at all. Yet, that's what all people of Cambodia must obey. Otherwise, Cambodia ought to go back to street justice. Perhaps, that 's what Sam Rainsy has been trying to tell us.
-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
